Compare Equinor ASA (EQNR) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Equinor ASA vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Equinor ASA trades at $43.42 (market cap $101.62B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.2 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Equinor ASA is far larger — about 44.8× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Equinor ASA pays a 3.63% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Equinor ASA for 59 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| EQNR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $101.62B | $2.27B |
Volume | 4,991,782 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Energy | — |
52-Week High | $45.75 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $22.41 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 59 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $110.31B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.63% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Equinor (EQNR) trades at $43.415, up 4.34% with strong technical momentum and bullish moving average signals. The stock shows attractive valuation metrics with P/E of 11.63 and EV/EBITDA of 2.39, while maintaining solid profitability with 21.32% ROE. Recent earnings beat expectations in two of the last three quarters, and the company continues shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks.
EQNR presents compelling value with significant upside to the $87.50 consensus price target, though investors face risks from volatile energy prices and declining profit margins. The company's LNG expansion strategy and strong cash flow generation support long-term growth potential, while technical indicators suggest near-term bullish momentum may continue.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
About Equinor ASA
Equinor is a Norway-based integrated oil and gas company. It has been publicly listed since 2001, but the government retains a 67% stake. Operating primarily on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, the firm produced 2.1 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2021 (52% oil) and ended the year with 5.4 billion barrels of proven reserves (49% oil). Operations also include offshore wind, solar, oil refineries and natural gas processing, marketing, and trading.
Read more on EQNR →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
