Emerson Electric Co. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Emerson Electric Co. trades at $161.01 (market cap $88.72B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.19 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Emerson Electric Co. is far larger — about 39.1× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Emerson Electric Co. pays a 1.4% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Emerson Electric Co. for 81 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| EMR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $88.72B | $2.27B |
Volume | 2,355,255 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $164.38 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $123.30 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 81 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $99.80B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.4% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Emerson Electric (EMR) trades at $159.22, down 1.34% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst support. Recent quarters show consistent earnings beats, with Q2 2026 EPS of $1.71 exceeding the $1.68 estimate. Revenue growth is steady, projected at $18.6B for 2026, while profitability metrics like a 13.83% net margin and 12.81% ROE reflect operational strength. The stock faces resistance near $160, with support at $158.
Outlook remains positive given earnings momentum and a consensus price target of $165.90, implying ~4% upside. Risks include debt levels rising to 31.26% of assets in 2025 and macroeconomic pressures on industrial demand. Institutional sentiment is bullish, with 53% of analysts rating Buy.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Emerson Electric is a multi-industrial conglomerate that operates under two business platforms: automation solutions and commercial and residential solutions. The latter is further subdivided into two operating segments: climate technologies, which sells HVAC and refrigeration products and services as well as tools and home products, which sells tools and compressors, among other products and services. Commercial and residential solutions boasts several household brands, including Copeland and RIDGID. Automation solutions is most known for its process manufacturing solutions, which consists of measurement instrumentation, as well as valves and actuators, among other products and services. Roughly half of the firm's geographic sales take place in the United States.
Read more on EMR →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →