Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL) vs National Beverage Corp. (FIZZ) Price & Performance

Estee Lauder Companies IncTrade
National Beverage Corp.Trade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Estee Lauder Companies Inc vs National Beverage Corp. — how do they compare? Estee Lauder Companies Inc trades at $97.46 (market cap $34.17B), while National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.35 (market cap $2.89B). The key difference: Estee Lauder Companies Inc is far larger — about 11.8× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Estee Lauder Companies Inc pays a 1.48% dividend while National Beverage Corp. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Estee Lauder Companies Inc for 122 Days and National Beverage Corp. for 33 Days on average.

ELFIZZ
Market Cap
$34.17B$2.89B
Volume
3,921,497553,950
Sector
Consumer StaplesConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$119.61$37.73
52-Week Low
$67.23$29.20
Typical Hold Time
122 Days33 Days
Enterprise Value
$39.92B$2.84B
Dividend Yield
1.48%—

Aura AI Summary

Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

Estée Lauder (EL) trades at $94.45, up 1.17% with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company shows improving earnings momentum with three consecutive quarterly beats, though 2025 results showed a net loss of $1.13B on $14.33B revenue. Analyst consensus is mixed with 48% buy ratings and a $103 price target, while recent news highlights AI partnerships and leadership changes driving strategic repositioning.

The stock presents a turnaround opportunity with strong brand positioning and digital initiatives, but faces execution risks from recent profitability challenges and high debt levels. Near-term catalysts include Q3 earnings and continued margin recovery, though competitive pressures and macroeconomic sensitivity remain headwinds for the luxury beauty sector.

National Beverage Corp.

FIZZ trades at $30.58, up 3.31% today, but faces bearish technical signals with recent earnings misses. Revenue has stagnated around $1.2B annually, though net income margins improved to 15.55% in 2025. The company maintains strong profitability with 40.13% ROE but faces margin pressure from input costs. A $3.25 special dividend payment in July 2026 reduced shareholder equity significantly.

Outlook remains challenging with analyst consensus leaning bearish (50% sell ratings). While valuation appears reasonable (P/E 16.58), stagnant growth and consecutive earnings misses pose headwinds. The key opportunity lies in potential revenue recovery, but investors face risks from competitive pressures and ongoing margin compression.

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Investor sentiment on Pluang

What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days

EL
0% Buy100% Sell
Avg holding period · 122 Days
FIZZ

No sentiment data available yet.

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Estee Lauder Companies Inc

Estee Lauder is the world leader in the global prestige beauty market, participating across skincare (56% of fiscal 2022 sales), makeup (26%), fragrance (14%), and haircare (4%) categories, with popular brands such as Estee Lauder, Clinique, MAC, La Mer, Jo Malone, Aveda, Bobbi Brown, Too Faced, Origins, Dr. Jart+, and The Ordinary. The firm operates in 150 countries, with 26% of fiscal 2022 revenue stemming from the Americas, 43% from Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, and 31% from Asia-Pacific. The company sells its products through department stores, travel retail, multi-brand specialty beauty stores, brand-dedicated freestanding stores, e-commerce, salons/spas, and perfumeries.

Read more on EL →

About National Beverage Corp.

National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.

Read more on FIZZ →