Duke Energy Corp vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Duke Energy Corp trades at $116.14 (market cap $91.10B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $17.22 (market cap $2.27B). The key difference: Duke Energy Corp is far larger — about 40.1× iShares Global Clean Energy ETF's market cap, and Duke Energy Corp pays a 3.71% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Duke Energy Corp for 74 Days and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF for 87 Days on average.
| DUK | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $91.10B | $2.27B |
Volume | 4,199,050 | 6,845,064 |
Sector | Utilities | — |
52-Week High | $133.46 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $113.23 | $15.78 |
Typical Hold Time | 74 Days | 87 Days |
Enterprise Value | $183.61B | — |
Dividend Yield | 3.71% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Duke Energy (DUK) trades at $115.50, down 0.14% with a bearish technical signal. The company demonstrates strong fundamentals with consistent earnings beats, 15.78% net income margin, and stable dividend payments. Recent news highlights Duke's positioning in data center growth opportunities while facing pressure from rising Treasury yields. The stock trades below analyst consensus target of $134.44 with 43.75% buy ratings.
DUK offers income investors a stable utility play with growth potential from data center demand, though rising interest rates and high debt levels present headwinds. The current valuation at 17.6 P/E appears reasonable given the company's consistent profitability and dividend reliability. Upside potential exists if data center contracts materialize as projected.
ICLN trades at $17.17, down 0.81% with bearish technical signals from moving averages. The ETF shows neutral momentum oscillators but faces significant volatility compared to traditional energy peers. Recent news highlights ICLN's 57.2% maximum drawdown and higher expense ratio of 0.38% versus fossil fuel ETFs, though geopolitical tensions are driving renewed interest in renewable energy infrastructure.
The clean energy sector faces competitive pressure from higher-yielding traditional energy ETFs, but long-term growth prospects remain supported by global energy transition trends. Key risks include expense ratio disadvantages and sector volatility, while potential catalysts include increased renewable adoption driven by geopolitical and environmental factors.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Latest headlines on both assets
Duke Energy is one of the largest U.S. utilities, with regulated utilities in the Carolinas, Indiana, Florida, Ohio, and Kentucky that deliver electricity to nearly 8 million customers. Its natural gas utilities serve more than 1.5 million customers. Duke operates in three major segments: electric utilities and infrastructure
Read more on DUK →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →