Polkadot vs Gram — how do they compare? Polkadot trades at Rp13,724 (market cap Rp23,35T, Rp781,42M 24h volume), while Gram trades at Rp23,912 (market cap Rp65,96T, Rp659,06M 24h volume). The key difference: Gram is far larger — about 2.8× Polkadot's market cap, and Polkadot's supply is capped (1,7B / 2,1B DOT (81%)) while Gram's keeps growing. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Polkadot for 118 Days and Gram for 6 Days on average.
| DOT | GRAM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp23,35T | Rp65,96T |
Volume (24h) | Rp781,42M | Rp659,06M |
Circulating Supply | 1,7B / 2,1B DOT (81%) | 2,8B GRAM |
Typical Hold Time | 118 Days | 6 Days |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Polkadot is trading at Rp13,701 with a market cap of Rp23.37T, showing bearish technical signals with 16 sell indicators versus 4 buy signals. The asset is testing key support at Rp13,577 with neutral oscillators suggesting potential consolidation. Network fundamentals show 81% of max supply in circulation with average hold time of 118 days, indicating stable long-term holder behavior despite current market weakness.
Overall outlook remains cautious with technical weakness dominating. Key opportunity lies in potential bounce from support levels, while major risks include continued bearish momentum and broader crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor Rp13,007 support level breach as critical risk indicator.
Gram (GRAM) is currently trading at Rp24,110 with a market cap of Rp66.67T, showing bearish technical signals with 11 sell signals versus 1 buy. The token recently gained 7% following Telegram's announcement of non-custodial wallet integration for its 1 billion users. Technical indicators show oversold RSI conditions but strong bearish momentum from ADX readings. Support levels are established at Rp22,820 (S3) and Rp23,127 (S2) with resistance at Rp24,166 (R1) and Rp24,473 (R2).
Overall outlook remains cautious due to bearish technical structure despite positive ecosystem news. Key opportunity lies in Telegram's massive user base adoption potential, while major risks include continued selling pressure and crypto market volatility. Investors should monitor wallet rollout progress and trading volume patterns for directional cues.
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
A crypto asset founded by Gavin Wood (a co-founder of Ethereum) alongside co-founders Peter Czaban and Robert Habermeier in 2016. It was finally launched in 2020 with the goal of incentivizing the global network of computers to use blockchain for its operation which users can launch and operate their own blockchains system.
Read more on DOT →GRAM, previously known as Toncoin, is the native token of The Open Network, a Layer 1 blockchain used for transaction fees, staking, governance, and powering TON-based apps. The network was originally developed as Telegram Open Network before being relaunched as The Open Network under TON Foundation.
Read more on GRAM →