Digital Realty Trust, Inc. vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Digital Realty Trust, Inc. trades at $176.26 (market cap $66.95B), while New York Times Co trades at $66.28 (market cap $10.47B). The key difference: Digital Realty Trust, Inc. is far larger — about 6.4× New York Times Co's market cap, and Digital Realty Trust, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.7%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Digital Realty Trust, Inc. for 94 Days and New York Times Co for 81 Days on average.
| DLR | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $66.95B | $10.47B |
Volume | 1,766,660 | 1,998,850 |
Sector | Real Estate | Media |
52-Week High | $203.91 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $147.93 | $54.66 |
Typical Hold Time | 94 Days | 81 Days |
Enterprise Value | $85.67B | $9.86B |
Dividend Yield | 2.7% | 1.42% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
DLR trades at $176.07, down 4.65% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The stock shows strong fundamental momentum, with Q2 2026 EPS beating expectations at $1.21 versus $0.4829, and revenue growth from $6.11B in 2025 to a projected $6.8B in 2026. Recent news highlights expansion in AI infrastructure, including a collaboration with Blackfuel and a new Los Angeles cable landing station, positioning the company to capitalize on data center demand.
The outlook for DLR is positive, driven by robust AI-driven demand and a record backlog, though high valuation multiples like a P/E of 88.03 pose a risk if growth slows. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with a $222.35 price target, but investors face risks from significant capital expenditures and debt levels.
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $66.60, up 3.95% over the past 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal. Recent earnings have consistently beaten expectations, with Q1 and Q2 2026 EPS exceeding forecasts. Revenue and net income have shown steady growth from 2022 to 2025, with margins improving. The company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share, payable in October 2026. Analyst consensus is a 'Hold' with a price target of $84.00, suggesting potential upside from the current price.
Outlook remains mixed; strong fundamentals and earnings beats support growth, but a shareholder lawsuit and bearish technical indicators present near-term risks. The stock offers a dividend yield, and institutional interest is present, but investors should weigh legal uncertainties and market sentiment against solid financial performance.
Trailing returns across standard periods
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Latest headlines on both assets
Digital Realty owns and operates nearly 300 data centers worldwide. It has more than 35 million rentable square feet across five continents. Digital's offerings range from retail co-location, where an enterprise may rent a single cabinet and rely on Digital to provide all the accommodations, to cold shells, where hyperscale cloud service providers can simply rent much, or all, of a barren, power-connected building. In recent years, Digital Realty has de-emphasized cold shells and now primarily provides higher-level service to tenants, which outsource their related IT needs to Digital. Digital Realty has also moved more into the co-location business, increasingly serving enterprises and facilitating network connections. Digital Realty operates as a real estate investment trust.
Read more on DLR →New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →