Compare Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) vs NRG Energy Inc (NRG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. vs NRG Energy Inc — how do they compare? Dolby Laboratories, Inc. trades at $58.9 (market cap $5.47B), while NRG Energy Inc trades at $108.2 (market cap $22.35B). The key difference: NRG Energy Inc is far larger — about 4.1× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.'s market cap, and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.46%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Dolby Laboratories, Inc. for 98 Days and NRG Energy Inc for 62 Days on average.
| DLB | NRG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.47B | $22.35B |
Volume | 1,058,284 | 5,011,942 |
Sector | Technology | Utilities |
52-Week High | $70.09 | $184.03 |
52-Week Low | $48.51 | $95.23 |
Typical Hold Time | 98 Days | 62 Days |
Enterprise Value | $4.85B | $46.30B |
Dividend Yield | 2.46% | 1.79% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Dolby Laboratories (DLB) trades at $58.35, down 0.19% with bearish technical signals. The company maintains strong profitability with 87.61% gross margins and has beaten earnings estimates for three consecutive quarters. Recent developments include expanded partnerships with Meta and leadership transition to new CEO Marc Whitten. Cash flow improved significantly in 2025 with $472M operating cash flow.
DLB presents a mixed outlook with strong fundamentals but technical weakness. The 47% upside to $90.33 consensus target offers potential, though near-term execution risks and licensing volatility remain concerns. Revenue stability around $1.3B and premium valuation metrics require continued innovation execution to justify current multiples.
NRG Energy trades at $108.61, up 4.84% with bullish technical signals and strong analyst support. The stock shows robust fundamentals with $30.71B revenue, 2.56% net margin, and attractive valuation at P/E 28.28 and P/S 0.66. Recent developments include a transformative 1.2 GW Texas data center power project and LS Power acquisition driving growth. Cash flow trends improved significantly from 2023's negative $1.5B to 2025's positive $3.83B, though 2026 projects a temporary dip.
Outlook remains positive with 70% analyst buy ratings and $202.90 consensus target representing 87% upside. Key opportunities include data center expansion and customer-backed power projects, while risks involve elevated debt levels (56.42% debt-to-asset ratio) and recent earnings misses. The stock presents growth potential but requires monitoring of execution on major capital projects.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
Dolby Laboratories Inc develops audio and surround sound for cinema, broadcast, home audio systems, in-car entertainment systems, DVD players, games, televisions, and personal computers. The company generates three fourths of its revenue from licensing its technology to consumer electronics manufacturers around the world. The rest of revenue comes from equipment sales to professional producers and audio engineering services.
Read more on DLB →About NRG Energy Inc
NRG Energy is one of the largest retail energy providers in the U.S., with 7 million customers, including its 2021 acquisition of Direct Energy. It also is one of the largest U.S. independent power producers, with 16 gigawatts of nuclear, coal, gas, and oil power generation capacity primarily in Texas. Since 2018, NRG has divested its 47% stake in NRG Yield, among other renewable energy and conventional generation investments. NRG exited Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a stand-alone entity in December 2003.
Read more on NRG →
