Colgate-Palmolive Company vs Warner Music Group Corp — how do they compare? Colgate-Palmolive Company trades at $92.31 (market cap $74.26B), while Warner Music Group Corp trades at $25.08 (market cap $13.82B). The key difference: Colgate-Palmolive Company is far larger — about 5.4× Warner Music Group Corp's market cap, and Warner Music Group Corp pays the higher dividend (3.03%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CL | WMG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $74.26B | $13.82B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Media |
52-Week High | $99.14 | $34.72 |
52-Week Low | $74.98 | $23.65 |
Enterprise Value | $80.74B | $18.12B |
Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 3.03% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Since its founding in 1806, Colgate-Palmolive has grown to become a leading global consumer product company. In addition to its namesake oral care line, the firm manufactures shampoos, shower gels, deodorants, and home care products that are sold in over 200 countries (international sales account for about 70% of its consolidated total, including approximately 45% from emerging regions). It also owns specialty pet food maker Hill's, which sells its products through veterinarians and specialty pet retailers.
Read more on CL →Warner Music Group is the third largest of the three major global record labels, with Vivendi's Universal Music in first and Sony Music in second. Warner's larger segment, recorded music, consists of iconic labels like Atlantic Records, Warner Records, and Parlophone Records and popular artists such as Ed Sheeran, Cardi B, Dua Lipa, and Blake Shelton. Warner Chappell, the firm's publishing arm, is the home to over 65,000 composers and songwriters with over a million copyrights represented. Warner is controlled by Access Industries, which owns an 84% economic interest and 99% of voting rights.
Read more on WMG →