Compare Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cincinnati Financial Corporation vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? Cincinnati Financial Corporation trades at $173.45 (market cap $26.58B), while Marqeta Inc trades at $15.52 (market cap $1.62B). The key difference: Cincinnati Financial Corporation is far larger — about 16.4× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Cincinnati Financial Corporation pays a 2.17% dividend while Marqeta Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CINF | MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $26.58B | $1.62B |
Sector | Financials | Technology |
52-Week High | $192.03 | $26.00 |
52-Week Low | $149.79 | $15.04 |
Enterprise Value | $25.71B | $935.36M |
Dividend Yield | 2.17% | — |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Cincinnati Financial Corp is a property and casualty insurance company that generates income through written premiums. A select group of independent agencies actively markets the company's business, home, and automotive insurance within their communities. These agents offer the company's personal lines as well as its standard market, excess, and surplus commercial line policies in many regions in the United States. Cincinnati Financial also offers leasing and financing services. The vast majority of the company's revenue is generated through commercial lines, followed by personal lines.
Read more on CINF →About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →
