Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Cincinnati Financial Corporation (CINF) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance

Cincinnati Financial CorporationTrade
Monster Beverage CorpTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Cincinnati Financial Corporation vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Cincinnati Financial Corporation trades at $173.45 (market cap $26.58B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.39 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 3.4× Cincinnati Financial Corporation's market cap, and Cincinnati Financial Corporation pays a 2.17% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

CINFMNST
Market Cap
$26.58B$89.20B
Sector
FinancialsConsumer Staples
52-Week High
$192.03$49.97
52-Week Low
$149.79$30.86
Enterprise Value
$25.71B$87.49B
Dividend Yield
2.17%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Cincinnati Financial Corporation

Cincinnati Financial Corp is a property and casualty insurance company that generates income through written premiums. A select group of independent agencies actively markets the company's business, home, and automotive insurance within their communities. These agents offer the company's personal lines as well as its standard market, excess, and surplus commercial line policies in many regions in the United States. Cincinnati Financial also offers leasing and financing services. The vast majority of the company's revenue is generated through commercial lines, followed by personal lines.

Read more on CINF

About Monster Beverage Corp

Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.

Read more on MNST