C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. trades at $147.04 (market cap $16.96B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $17.3 (market cap $8.35B). The key difference: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. is far larger — about 2× TeraWulf Inc's market cap, and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. pays a 1.74% dividend while TeraWulf Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CHRW | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $16.96B | $8.35B |
Sector | Industrials | Technology |
52-Week High | $209.42 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $118.77 | $5.24 |
Enterprise Value | $18.78B | $10.97B |
Dividend Yield | 1.74% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CHRW trades at $147.68, down 0.41% with bearish technical signals, though recent earnings beats and strong profitability metrics provide fundamental support. The company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $1.61, beating expectations, with revenue of $16.23B in 2025 and net income margin improving to 3.73%. Analyst consensus remains positive with a $193 price target, while recent news highlights dividend declarations and institutional buying activity.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic given earnings momentum and solid ROE of 37.12%, though technical weakness and legal challenges pose near-term risks. The stock offers growth potential with reasonable valuation (P/E 27.7) but faces headwinds from freight demand volatility and competitive pressures in logistics.
WULF trades at $17.04, up 5.19% on the day amid a broader neocloud infrastructure rally. The stock shows bearish technical signals with 17 sell signals versus 2 buys, while fundamentals reveal significant challenges with a -1,179.94% net income margin and consistent earnings misses. Recent Q2 2026 results showed a $0.37 per share loss versus $0.20 expected, though revenue beat estimates. The company is expanding its high-performance computing capacity with 102 MW operational and 336 MW under construction, supported by a major Anthropic leasing agreement.
Despite unanimous analyst buy ratings and a $38 consensus price target representing 123% upside, WULF faces substantial execution risks and profitability concerns. The transition to AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but near-term losses and high capital requirements create volatility. Investors should weigh the significant growth opportunity against persistent negative cash flow and competitive pressures in the evolving data center market.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
C.H. Robinson is a top-tier non-asset-based third-party logistics provider with a significant focus on domestic freight brokerage (57% of 2021 net revenue), which reflects mostly truck brokerage but also rail intermodal. Additionally, the firm also operates a large air and ocean forwarding division (34%), which has grown organically and via tuck-in acquisitions. The remainder of revenue consists of the European truck-brokerage division, transportation management services, and a legacy produce-sourcing operation.
Read more on CHRW →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →