C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. trades at $144.86 (market cap $16.96B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.5. The key difference: C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. pays a 1.74% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CHRW | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $16.96B | — |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $209.42 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $118.77 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $18.78B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.74% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CHRW trades at $146.75, down 1.04% today, amid a bearish technical signal. Recent earnings beats, including Q2 2026 EPS of $1.61 versus $1.53 expected, highlight operational strength. The company maintains a solid dividend, with a $0.63 payment declared for October 2026. Revenue declined to $16.23B in 2025, but net income margin improved to 3.73%. Analyst consensus is bullish with a $193 price target, though technical indicators show selling pressure near key support at $143.
The outlook is mixed: strong profitability and analyst support suggest upside, but technical weakness and a pending legal appeal pose near-term risks. Earnings growth from pricing and efficiency gains remains the key catalyst, while market volatility and freight demand fluctuations are headwinds for investors.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
C.H. Robinson is a top-tier non-asset-based third-party logistics provider with a significant focus on domestic freight brokerage (57% of 2021 net revenue), which reflects mostly truck brokerage but also rail intermodal. Additionally, the firm also operates a large air and ocean forwarding division (34%), which has grown organically and via tuck-in acquisitions. The remainder of revenue consists of the European truck-brokerage division, transportation management services, and a legacy produce-sourcing operation.
Read more on CHRW →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →