Compare Carlyle Group Inc (CG) vs iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Carlyle Group Inc vs iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF — how do they compare? Carlyle Group Inc trades at $44.23 (market cap $16.37B), while iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF trades at $107.03. The key difference: Carlyle Group Inc pays a 3.08% dividend while iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF pays none, and Carlyle Group Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CG | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $16.37B | — |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $69.35 | $112.91 |
52-Week Low | $40.52 | $106.96 |
Dividend Yield | 3.08% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
CG trades at $44.14, down 1.27% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and bearish moving averages. The company reported revenue of $3.21B and net income of $808.70M for 2025, with a P/E ratio of 30.24. Recent developments include the acquisition of a majority stake in MAI Capital Management and the upcoming Q2 2026 earnings release on August 5, 2026.
The outlook is mixed, with analyst consensus leaning bullish (53.84% Buy) and a price target of $58.57 implying significant upside. However, risks include volatile cash flows from operations, recent earnings misses, and a high valuation. The stock's performance hinges on successful execution of growth initiatives and improved earnings consistency.
LQD, the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, trades at $106.96, down 0.47% on the day. Technical indicators show a bearish trend with moving averages signaling sell pressure, though oscillators suggest potential oversold conditions. Recent dividend payouts of $0.38-$0.42 per share highlight its income focus. Fixed income ETFs are gaining investor attention amid economic resilience and rate uncertainty, with bond inflows surging 60% year-over-year as of June 2026 (CNBC, 2026-06-25).
Outlook: LQD offers exposure to investment-grade corporate bonds with steady dividends, but faces headwinds from potential Fed rate hikes and inflation concerns. Risks include interest rate sensitivity and narrowing market breadth. Analyst comparisons favor LQD for lower drawdowns versus peers, but investors should weigh yield against Treasury alternatives. The ETF's performance hinges on macroeconomic policy shifts and corporate debt market stability.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Carlyle Group Inc
The Carlyle Group is one of the world's largest alternative-asset managers, with $376.4 billion in total assets under management, including $259.6 billion in fee-earning AUM, at the end of June 2022. The company has three core business segments: private equity, which includes private equity, real estate, infrastructure and natural resources funds (accounting for 41% of fee-earning AUM and 65% of base management fees during 2021), global credit (45% and 24%) and investment solutions (14% and 11%). The firm primarily serves institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals. Carlyle operates through 29 offices across five continents, serving close to 2,700 active carry fund investors from 95 countries.
Read more on CG →About iShares iBoxx $ Inv Grade Corporate Bond ETF
The fund will invest at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index, and it will invest at least 90% of its assets in fixed income securities of the types included in the underlying index that the advisor believes will help the fund track the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to provide a broad representation of the US dollar-denominated liquid investment-grade corporate bond market.
Read more on LQD →
