Compare Conflux (CFX) vs ICON (ICX) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Conflux vs ICON — how do they compare? Conflux trades at Rp774.02 (market cap Rp4,05T, Rp188,32M 24h volume), while ICON trades at Rp430.45 (market cap Rp482,15M, Rp8,81M 24h volume). The key difference: Conflux is far larger — about 8399.9× ICON's market cap, and Conflux's circulating supply is 5,2B CFX versus 1,1B ICX for ICON. Which is the better fit depends on your goals — on Pluang, investors hold Conflux for 38 Days and ICON for 77 Days on average.
| CFX | ICX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | Rp4,05T | Rp482,15M |
Volume (24h) | Rp188,32M | Rp8,81M |
Circulating Supply | 5,2B CFX | 1,1B ICX |
Typical Hold Time | 38 Days | 77 Days |
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
Investor sentiment on Pluang
What Pluang investors did over the last 30 days
No sentiment data available yet.
About Conflux
Conflux (CFX) is a public layer-1 blockchain that was made to power decentralized applications (dApps), e-commerce, and Web 3.0 infrastructure by being more scalable, decentralized, and secure than existing protocols. Conflux makes it easier to transfer valuable assets by making the process quick, effective, free of network congestion, and with low transaction costs. The platform is based on the Tree-Graph consensus mechanism, and it combines Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) algorithms to achieve consensus. The protocol uses Turing-complete smart contracts written in Solidity, just like those on Ethereum, and is compatible with the EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine).
Read more on CFX →About ICON
ICON Network (ICX) is a layer-one blockchain from South Korea. Its declared vision is to build an interoperable blockchain network bridging autonomous online communities and real-world enterprises. ICX focuses on delivering real-world utility by advancing hyperconnectivity through the promotion of frictionless value exchanges.
Read more on ICX →
