Compare Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) vs Banco Santander SA (SAN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cadence Design Systems Inc vs Banco Santander SA — how do they compare? Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $378.2 (market cap $104.24B), while Banco Santander SA trades at $13.59 (market cap $195.40B). The key difference: Banco Santander SA is the larger of the two by market cap, and Banco Santander SA pays a 2.04% dividend while Cadence Design Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CDNS | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $104.24B | $195.40B |
Sector | Technology | Financials |
52-Week High | $416.39 | $14.37 |
52-Week Low | $265.66 | $8.31 |
Enterprise Value | $105.91B | — |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.04% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at $377.92, down 1.63% on the day, with strong analyst support (84% buy ratings) and a $400.25 consensus price target. The stock shows bullish technical signals with support at $373 and resistance at $385. Recent quarterly earnings have consistently beaten expectations, with Q2 2026 results expected on July 27, 2026. Revenue growth remains robust, climbing from $3.6B in 2022 to $5.3B in 2025, though profit margins have moderated slightly.
CDNS presents a compelling growth story driven by AI and semiconductor design demand, with upside to analyst targets. However, high valuation multiples (P/E 88.09, P/S 18.68) pose risks if growth slows. Key near-term catalyst is Q2 earnings; sustained execution is critical to justify premium valuation amid competitive pressures.
Banco Santander (SAN) trades at $13.66, down 1.51% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages and neutral oscillators. The company reported Q1 2026 EPS of $0.4144, beating expectations, and maintains a strong net income margin of 26.72%. Recent developments include the acquisition of TSB and AI-driven efficiency initiatives targeting over $1.15 billion in business value. The stock shows a P/E of 13.57 and P/B of 1.62, indicating reasonable valuation relative to peers.
The outlook for SAN is positive, supported by record profitability, strategic acquisitions, and cost-saving measures. However, risks include declining cash flows, regulatory scrutiny in Spain, and macroeconomic pressures on loan growth. Analyst consensus is bullish with 64% buy ratings, but investors should monitor execution on efficiency targets and integration of recent acquisitions.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Cadence Design Systems Inc
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.
Read more on CDNS →About Banco Santander SA
Santander's focus is on retail and commercial banking. Latin America is geographically the largest operation, with Brazil by far the largest. Its continental European business is still mainly Iberian. Santander's U.K. presence is the result of the acquisition of building society Abbey. In the U.S., Santander operates a vehicle finance business and a regional bank focused on the Northeastern states.
Read more on SAN →
