Compare Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) vs New York Times Co (NYT) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cadence Design Systems Inc vs New York Times Co — how do they compare? Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $326.38 (market cap $90.20B), while New York Times Co trades at $64.27 (market cap $10.28B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is far larger — about 8.8× New York Times Co's market cap, and New York Times Co pays a 1.44% dividend while Cadence Design Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CDNS | NYT | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $90.20B | $10.28B |
Sector | Technology | Media |
52-Week High | $416.39 | $85.86 |
52-Week Low | $265.66 | $54.66 |
Enterprise Value | $91.41B | $9.67B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.44% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at $331.91, down 2.16% amid a bearish technical signal, though it remains supported by strong fundamentals. The company reported Q2 2026 earnings that beat estimates, with revenue growth of 24.2% driven by AI demand, and raised its full-year outlook. Analyst consensus is strongly bullish with an average price target of $415.11, representing 25% upside potential from current levels.
The stock offers compelling growth prospects from AI-driven semiconductor design demand, with record backlog of $8.1 billion supporting future revenue visibility. Key risks include high valuation multiples (P/E 65.12) and potential semiconductor cycle volatility. Institutional ownership remains strong with recent position increases by major funds like Amundi.
The New York Times Company (NYT) trades at $64.80, up 1.98% today, with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. Fundamentals show strong revenue growth to $2.82 billion in 2025 and a net income margin of 13.19%, though digital subscriber growth concerns have pressured the stock. The current P/E ratio is 26.55, above industry averages, reflecting its premium valuation.
The outlook is mixed; solid profitability and a consensus price target of $77.50 suggest upside, but slowing subscriber additions and high valuation pose risks. Investor sentiment is cautious due to recent price weakness, with analysts predominantly holding a 'Hold' rating, indicating a wait-and-see approach for near-term catalysts.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Cadence Design Systems Inc
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.
Read more on CDNS →About New York Times Co
New York Times Co is an American media company known for publishing its flagship newspaper, The New York Times. The company also operates the International New York Times newspaper, as well as digital properties such as nytimes and various smartphone applications. Circulation of The New York Times is the source of revenue for the company, followed by print and digital advertising and its paid digital-only subscription to The New York Times. The company has a daily print circulation of over 500,000 and 1,000,000 on Sundays. The source of growth for The New York Times is its digital subscription service, which has over 1,000,000 paid users.
Read more on NYT →
