Compare Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cadence Design Systems Inc vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $326.4 (market cap $90.20B), while Marqeta Inc trades at $15.52 (market cap $1.62B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is far larger — about 55.7× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Cadence Design Systems Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Marqeta Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CDNS | MQ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $90.20B | $1.62B |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
52-Week High | $416.39 | $26.00 |
52-Week Low | $265.66 | $15.04 |
Enterprise Value | $91.41B | $935.36M |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Cadence Design Systems Inc
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.
Read more on CDNS →About Marqeta Inc
Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.
Read more on MQ →
