Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) vs Marqeta Inc (MQ) Price & Performance

Cadence Design Systems IncTrade
Marqeta IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Cadence Design Systems Inc vs Marqeta Inc — how do they compare? Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $326.4 (market cap $90.20B), while Marqeta Inc trades at $15.52 (market cap $1.62B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is far larger — about 55.7× Marqeta Inc's market cap, and Cadence Design Systems Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Marqeta Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

CDNSMQ
Market Cap
$90.20B$1.62B
Sector
TechnologyTechnology
52-Week High
$416.39$26.00
52-Week Low
$265.66$15.04
Enterprise Value
$91.41B$935.36M

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

About Cadence Design Systems Inc

Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.

Read more on CDNS

About Marqeta Inc

Headquartered in Oakland, California, and founded in 2010, Marqeta provides its clients with a card-issuing platform that offers the infrastructure and tools necessary to offer digital, physical, and tokenized payment options without the need for a traditional bank. The company's open APIs are designed to allow third parties like DoorDash, Klarna, and Block to rapidly develop and deploy innovative card-based products and payment services without the need to develop the underlying technology. The company generates revenue primarily through processing and ATM fees for cards issued on its platform.

Read more on MQ