Compare Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) vs Microchip Technology Inc. (MCHP) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Cadence Design Systems Inc vs Microchip Technology Inc. — how do they compare? Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $371.54 (market cap $104.24B), while Microchip Technology Inc. trades at $86.25 (market cap $47.30B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is far larger — about 2.2× Microchip Technology Inc.'s market cap, and Microchip Technology Inc. pays a 2.09% dividend while Cadence Design Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CDNS | MCHP | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $104.24B | $47.30B |
Sector | Technology | Technology |
52-Week High | $416.39 | $102.97 |
52-Week Low | $265.66 | $49.02 |
Enterprise Value | $105.91B | $52.60B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.09% |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at $377.92, down 1.63% on the day, with strong analyst support (84% buy ratings) and a $400.25 consensus price target. The stock shows bullish technical signals with support at $373 and resistance at $385. Recent quarterly earnings have consistently beaten expectations, with Q2 2026 results expected on July 27, 2026. Revenue growth remains robust, climbing from $3.6B in 2022 to $5.3B in 2025, though profit margins have moderated slightly.
CDNS presents a compelling growth story driven by AI and semiconductor design demand, with upside to analyst targets. However, high valuation multiples (P/E 88.09, P/S 18.68) pose risks if growth slows. Key near-term catalyst is Q2 earnings; sustained execution is critical to justify premium valuation amid competitive pressures.
Microchip Technology (MCHP) trades at $84.23, down 4.92% in the last session, with a bearish technical signal and support near $81. The company reported a net loss of -$500K in 2025 despite beating EPS estimates in recent quarters, while revenue declined to $4.40B. Analyst consensus remains strongly bullish with a $113.33 price target, supported by positive news on AI and aerospace demand.
MCHP faces near-term pressure from weak profitability and high debt, but long-term growth is supported by AI, data center, and aerospace exposure. Risks include cyclical semiconductor demand and execution challenges, yet institutional sentiment and recent product launches suggest potential recovery if earnings improve.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Cadence Design Systems Inc
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.
Read more on CDNS →About Microchip Technology Inc.
Microchip became an independent company in 1989 when it was spun off from General Instrument. More than half of revenue comes from MCUs, which are used in a wide array of electronic devices from remote controls to garage door openers to power windows in autos. The company's strength lies in lower-end 8-bit MCUs that are suitable for a wider range of less technologically advanced devices, but the firm has expanded its presence in higher-end MCUs and analog chips as well.
Read more on MCHP →
