Cardinal Health Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Cardinal Health Inc trades at $236.81 (market cap $55.88B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.44. The key difference: Cardinal Health Inc pays a 0.86% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and Cardinal Health Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| CAH | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $55.88B | — |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $240.26 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $146.04 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $59.91B | — |
Dividend Yield | 0.86% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Cardinal Health (CAH) trades at $237.18, up 0.33% on the day, near its 52-week high. The stock shows bullish technical signals with consistent earnings beats, including Q2 2026 EPS of $2.91 versus $2.42 expected. Revenue reached $222.58 billion in 2025, with net income margin improving to 0.67%. Positive sentiment is driven by strong Q4 2026 results and optimistic fiscal 2027 guidance highlighted by Reuters on August 11, 2026.
Outlook remains favorable with analyst consensus price target of $266.43 implying 12% upside. Key opportunities include pharmaceutical segment strength and dividend payments, while risks involve high debt levels and thin profit margins. The bullish analyst stance (54.55% buy ratings) supports growth potential, but investors should monitor cash flow volatility and competitive pressures.
ICLN trades at $18.69, up 3.37% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages showing 11 sell signals versus 2 buy signals. The ETF faces headwinds from higher expense ratios compared to traditional energy peers and regulatory uncertainty around renewable energy permits. Recent news highlights clean energy's 25% gains in 2026 but notes volatility concerns versus fossil fuel alternatives.
The outlook remains cautious as policy risks and competitive pressure from lower-cost energy ETFs challenge near-term performance. Long-term growth potential exists from global clean energy adoption, but investors face volatility and fee disadvantages relative to traditional energy funds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Cardinal Health is a leading pharmaceutical wholesaler, engaged in the sourcing and distribution of branded, generic, and specialty pharmaceutical products to pharmacies (retail chains, independent, and mail-order), hospitals networks, and healthcare providers. Along with AmerisourceBergen and McKesson, the three compose well over 90% of the U.S. pharmaceutical wholesale industry. Cardinal Health also supplies medical-surgical products and equipment to healthcare facilities in North America, Europe, and Asia.
Read more on CAH →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →