Investment
Features
FeesSafety
Academy
More
Pluang+

Compare Cardinal Health Inc (CAH) vs Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) Price & Performance

Cardinal Health IncTrade
Cadence Design Systems IncTrade

Price performance (Past 24H)

Key statistics

Cardinal Health Inc vs Cadence Design Systems Inc — how do they compare? Cardinal Health Inc trades at $240.57 (market cap $55.88B), while Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $326.99 (market cap $90.20B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Cardinal Health Inc pays a 0.86% dividend while Cadence Design Systems Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.

CAHCDNS
Market Cap
$55.88B$90.20B
Sector
HealthTechnology
52-Week High
$240.26$416.39
52-Week Low
$146.04$265.66
Enterprise Value
$59.91B$91.41B
Dividend Yield
0.86%

Returns comparison

Trailing returns across standard periods

Top news

Latest headlines on both assets

About Cardinal Health Inc

Cardinal Health is a leading pharmaceutical wholesaler, engaged in the sourcing and distribution of branded, generic, and specialty pharmaceutical products to pharmacies (retail chains, independent, and mail-order), hospitals networks, and healthcare providers. Along with AmerisourceBergen and McKesson, the three compose well over 90% of the U.S. pharmaceutical wholesale industry. Cardinal Health also supplies medical-surgical products and equipment to healthcare facilities in North America, Europe, and Asia.

Read more on CAH

About Cadence Design Systems Inc

Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.

Read more on CDNS