Blackstone Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Blackstone Inc trades at $147.55 (market cap $117.44B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.2. The key difference: Blackstone Inc pays a 3.55% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $117.44B | — |
Sector | Financials | — |
52-Week High | $188.68 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $102.12 | $13.66 |
Dividend Yield | 3.55% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Blackstone (BX) trades at $146.44, up 3.37% today, near its recent high. The stock shows strong earnings momentum with three consecutive quarterly beats and a robust 25.85% net income margin. Technical indicators are bullish overall, though RSI levels suggest potential overbought conditions. Recent corporate activity includes a $2.5 billion investment in Air Canada's Aeroplan loyalty program, highlighting aggressive growth initiatives.
The outlook remains positive given consistent earnings outperformance and strategic acquisitions. Key risks include market sensitivity to private equity cycles and high valuation multiples. With a consensus price target of $144.00 and 63% analyst buy ratings, Wall Street sentiment is bullish, but investors should monitor execution on large deals and broader economic trends.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Blackstone is one of the world's largest alternative asset managers with $940.8 billion in total asset under management, including $683.8 billion in fee-earning asset under management, at the end of June 2022.
Read more on BX →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →