Compare Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA (BUD) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA trades at $79.12 (market cap $159.01B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.87 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA is the larger of the two by market cap, and Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA pays a 1.67% dividend while Monster Beverage Corp pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BUD | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $159.01B | $89.20B |
Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $86.48 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $57.93 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $223.42B | $87.49B |
Dividend Yield | 1.67% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BUD trades at $79.3, down 4.56% on the day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and oscillators. Fundamentally, the company reported Q2 2026 EPS of $1.21, beating estimates, and maintains strong cash flow with $14.88B from operations in 2025. Revenue for 2025 was $59.32B, with net income margin improving to 11.52%. Recent news includes mixed institutional activity and Q2 earnings coverage highlighting volume growth and premium brand strength.
The outlook is supported by analyst consensus with a $90.17 price target and 57.78% buy ratings, but risks include recent shareholder share sales and competitive pressures. Earnings growth and deleveraging trends provide upside, while technical weakness near support at $79 requires monitoring for stability.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $45.895, up 0.45% with a bearish technical signal despite recent earnings beats. The company shows strong fundamentals with 2025 revenue of $8.29B and net income of $1.91B, achieving a 23.08% net margin. Recent Q2 2026 results beat expectations with $0.60 EPS versus $0.59 expected, driven by international growth. A 2-for-1 stock split occurred on August 11, 2026, while analyst consensus remains positive with 51% buy ratings and a $51.14 price target.
MNST's outlook is supported by robust earnings growth and global expansion, but elevated valuation ratios (P/E 42.16, P/S 9.75) pose risks. Competitive pressures in the energy drink sector and macroeconomic sensitivity could challenge margins. Institutional sentiment is cautiously optimistic, with upside potential to the consensus target representing 11% gain from current levels.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA
Anheuser-Busch InBev is the largest brewer in the world and one of the world's top five consumer product companies, as measured by EBITDA. After the SABMiller acquisition, the company's portfolio now contains five of the top 10 beer brands by sales and 18 brands with retail sales over $1 billion. AB InBev was created by the 2008 merger of Belgium-based InBev and U.S.-based Anheuser-Busch. The firm holds a 62% economic interest in Ambev and in 2016 acquired SABMiller.
Read more on BUD →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
