Boston Scientific Corporation vs Northrop Grumman Corporation — how do they compare? Boston Scientific Corporation trades at $51 (market cap $71.46B), while Northrop Grumman Corporation trades at $575 (market cap $82.10B). The key difference: Boston Scientific Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation are close in size by market cap, and Northrop Grumman Corporation pays a 1.63% dividend while Boston Scientific Corporation pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BSX | NOC | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $71.46B | $82.10B |
Sector | Health | Industrials |
52-Week High | $108.14 | $768.02 |
52-Week Low | $42.63 | $496.02 |
Enterprise Value | $83.55B | $96.08B |
Dividend Yield | — | 1.63% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Boston Scientific (BSX) trades at $49.31, up slightly by 0.02% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages despite overbought RSI readings near 77–83. The company reported strong Q2 2026 results, beating EPS estimates with $0.86 actual versus $0.835 expected, and revenue growth of 7.5%. Fundamentals show robust profitability with a net income margin of 17.5% and ROE of 15.52%, though 2026 guidance was trimmed due to WATCHMAN and electrophysiology segment pressures.
BSX presents a compelling investment case with 86% analyst buy ratings and a $67.21 consensus price target implying 36% upside. Key risks include competitive pressures in medical devices and execution on cost savings. The stock's valuation at a P/E of 19.96 appears reasonable given earnings growth, but investors must weigh near-term headwinds against long-term innovation catalysts.
Northrop Grumman (NOC) trades at $571.58, up 0.68% on the day, with a bullish technical signal driven by moving averages despite overbought RSI readings. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating EPS estimates with $7.68 actual versus $6.82 expected, and raised full-year guidance amid a record $105 billion backlog. Fundamentals show robust profitability with a 10.48% net income margin and 26.96% ROE, while valuation metrics like a P/E of 18.17 appear reasonable relative to growth.
Outlook remains positive given defense spending tailwinds and contract wins like the $7.6 billion Sentinel program, though margin pressures and high debt levels pose risks. Analysts are bullish with a $598.57 consensus target, implying ~5% upside from current levels, supported by 20 buy ratings versus 1 sell.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Boston Scientific produces less invasive medical devices that are inserted into the human body through small openings or cuts. It manufactures products for use in angioplasty, blood clot filtration, cardiac rhythm management, catheter-directed ultrasound imaging, structural heart disease, upper gastrointestinal tract diagnostics, interventional oncology, and treatment of incontinence. The firm markets its devices to healthcare professionals and institutions globally. Foreign sales account for nearly half of the firm's total sales.
Read more on BSX →Northrop Grumman is a defense contractor that is diversified across short-cycle and long-cycle businesses. The firm's segments include aeronautics, mission systems, defense services, and space systems. The company's aerospace segment creates the fuselage for the massive F-35 program and produces various piloted and autonomous flight systems. Mission systems creates a variety of sensors and processors for defense hardware. The defense systems segment is a long-range missile manufacturer. Finally, the company's space systems segment produces various space structures, sensors, and satellites.
Read more on NOC →