Compare Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Boston Scientific Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Boston Scientific Corporation trades at $51.31 (market cap $74.19B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.45. The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Boston Scientific Corporation nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BSX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $74.19B | — |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $108.14 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $42.63 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $86.27B | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Boston Scientific (BSX) trades at $51.27, up 1.6% with strong technical momentum and bullish moving averages. The company delivered three consecutive quarterly EPS beats in 2026, with Q2 EPS of $0.86 exceeding expectations. Revenue grew to $20.07B in 2025 with a 14.4% net margin, while analyst consensus shows 86% buy ratings with a $67.21 price target. Recent insider buying by the CEO and director signals confidence despite near-term guidance challenges.
BSX presents attractive valuation with 44% upside to consensus target, supported by strong fundamentals and institutional support. Key risks include competitive pressures in WATCHMAN and electrophysiology segments, along with elevated RSI levels suggesting potential near-term consolidation. The long-term growth trajectory remains intact with 2026 revenue projected at $21B and 17.5% margins.
ICLN trades at $18.69, up 3.37% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages showing 11 sell signals versus 2 buy signals. The ETF faces headwinds from higher expense ratios compared to traditional energy peers and regulatory uncertainty around renewable energy permits. Recent news highlights clean energy's 25% gains in 2026 but notes volatility concerns versus fossil fuel alternatives.
The outlook remains cautious as policy risks and competitive pressure from lower-cost energy ETFs challenge near-term performance. Long-term growth potential exists from global clean energy adoption, but investors face volatility and fee disadvantages relative to traditional energy funds.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Boston Scientific Corporation
Boston Scientific produces less invasive medical devices that are inserted into the human body through small openings or cuts. It manufactures products for use in angioplasty, blood clot filtration, cardiac rhythm management, catheter-directed ultrasound imaging, structural heart disease, upper gastrointestinal tract diagnostics, interventional oncology, and treatment of incontinence. The firm markets its devices to healthcare professionals and institutions globally. Foreign sales account for nearly half of the firm's total sales.
Read more on BSX →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
