Compare Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Boston Scientific Corporation vs Cadence Design Systems Inc — how do they compare? Boston Scientific Corporation trades at $51.15 (market cap $71.46B), while Cadence Design Systems Inc trades at $328.27 (market cap $91.41B). The key difference: Cadence Design Systems Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and Cadence Design Systems Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Boston Scientific Corporation nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BSX | CDNS | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $71.46B | $91.41B |
Sector | Health | Technology |
52-Week High | $108.14 | $416.39 |
52-Week Low | $42.63 | $265.66 |
Enterprise Value | $83.55B | $92.62B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Boston Scientific (BSX) trades at $49.31, up slightly by 0.02% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages despite overbought RSI readings near 77–83. The company reported strong Q2 2026 results, beating EPS estimates with $0.86 actual versus $0.835 expected, and revenue growth of 7.5%. Fundamentals show robust profitability with a net income margin of 17.5% and ROE of 15.52%, though 2026 guidance was trimmed due to WATCHMAN and electrophysiology segment pressures.
BSX presents a compelling investment case with 86% analyst buy ratings and a $67.21 consensus price target implying 36% upside. Key risks include competitive pressures in medical devices and execution on cost savings. The stock's valuation at a P/E of 19.96 appears reasonable given earnings growth, but investors must weigh near-term headwinds against long-term innovation catalysts.
Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at $339.24, up 0.24% on the day, with a neutral technical signal and strong fundamental performance. The stock has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q2 2026 EPS of $2.11 surpassing expectations. Revenue growth is robust, driven by AI demand, with 2025 revenue reaching $5.30 billion and a net income margin of 23.61%. Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with 83.87% recommending Buy and a consensus price target of $415.11.
The outlook for CDNS is favorable, supported by strong AI-driven demand, record backlog of $8.1 billion as of Q2 2026 (Zacks Investment Research, 2026-07-30), and upwardly revised guidance. Risks include high valuation multiples, such as a P/E of 67.44, and potential market volatility amid semiconductor sector fluctuations. Institutional confidence remains high, with Amundi increasing its stake by 3.8% in Q1 2026 (Defense World, 2026-07-30).
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Boston Scientific Corporation
Boston Scientific produces less invasive medical devices that are inserted into the human body through small openings or cuts. It manufactures products for use in angioplasty, blood clot filtration, cardiac rhythm management, catheter-directed ultrasound imaging, structural heart disease, upper gastrointestinal tract diagnostics, interventional oncology, and treatment of incontinence. The firm markets its devices to healthcare professionals and institutions globally. Foreign sales account for nearly half of the firm's total sales.
Read more on BSX →About Cadence Design Systems Inc
Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house chip design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.
Read more on CDNS →
