Baker Hughes Co vs Warner Music Group Corp — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $64.56 (market cap $64.34B), while Warner Music Group Corp trades at $25.3 (market cap $13.12B). The key difference: Baker Hughes Co is far larger — about 4.9× Warner Music Group Corp's market cap, and Warner Music Group Corp pays the higher dividend (3.19%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | WMG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $64.34B | $13.12B |
Sector | Energy | Media |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $34.72 |
52-Week Low | $42.51 | $23.65 |
Enterprise Value | $64.86B | $17.42B |
Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 3.19% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →Warner Music Group is the third largest of the three major global record labels, with Vivendi's Universal Music in first and Sony Music in second. Warner's larger segment, recorded music, consists of iconic labels like Atlantic Records, Warner Records, and Parlophone Records and popular artists such as Ed Sheeran, Cardi B, Dua Lipa, and Blake Shelton. Warner Chappell, the firm's publishing arm, is the home to over 65,000 composers and songwriters with over a million copyrights represented. Warner is controlled by Access Industries, which owns an 84% economic interest and 99% of voting rights.
Read more on WMG →