Compare Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs United States Natural Gas Fund (UNG) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Baker Hughes Co vs United States Natural Gas Fund — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $57.93 (market cap $57.32B), while United States Natural Gas Fund trades at $10.39. The key difference: Baker Hughes Co pays a 1.59% dividend while United States Natural Gas Fund pays none, and Baker Hughes Co is trading nearer its 52-week high, United States Natural Gas Fund nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $57.32B | — |
Sector | Energy | Commodities - Energy |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $16.90 |
52-Week Low | $38.68 | $10.15 |
Enterprise Value | $58.72B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.59% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Baker Hughes (BKR) trades at $57.66, up 0.17% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. Recent earnings beats and a 66.7% buy rating from analysts, alongside a $74.09 price target, highlight positive momentum. The company secured key LNG and power infrastructure contracts, supporting growth in energy transition markets. Operating cash flow remains robust at $3.81B for 2025, though net income dipped slightly to $2.59B.
Outlook is positive driven by LNG expansion and AI-powered energy demand, but risks include oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Chart Industries acquisition. Valuation metrics like a P/E of 18.42 and ROE of 17.14% suggest reasonable pricing for growth prospects, though execution on new contracts is critical for sustained upside.
UNG trades at $10.37, down 2.17% today, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The fund tracks natural gas futures, facing headwinds from contango effects and weather-dependent demand. Recent news highlights volatility tied to LNG exports and storage data, with EIA forecasting record 2026 supply and demand (Reuters, 2026-06-09).
Outlook remains cautious due to structural challenges in futures roll costs and price sensitivity to weather. Risks include production swings and geopolitical factors, while opportunities hinge on sustained LNG demand growth. Long-term performance has been hampered by contango, as noted by 24/7 Wall Street (2026-05-28).
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Baker Hughes Co
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →About United States Natural Gas Fund
UNG is a commodity ETF that tracks the daily price movements of natural gas futures. It primarily invests in front-month contracts at the Henry Hub, making it a highly volatile tool for short-term trading rather than long-term holding due to contango and roll costs.
Read more on UNG →
