Baker Hughes Co vs TotalEnergies SE — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $57.78 (market cap $57.32B), while TotalEnergies SE trades at $80.86 (market cap $180.15B). The key difference: TotalEnergies SE is far larger — about 3.1× Baker Hughes Co's market cap, and TotalEnergies SE pays the higher dividend (5.21%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | TTE | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $57.32B | $180.15B |
Sector | Energy | Energy |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $93.60 |
52-Week Low | $38.68 | $57.39 |
Enterprise Value | $58.72B | $214.29B |
Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 5.21% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Baker Hughes (BKR) trades at $57.66, up 0.17% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. Recent earnings beats and a 66.7% buy rating from analysts, alongside a $74.09 price target, highlight positive momentum. The company secured key LNG and power infrastructure contracts, supporting growth in energy transition markets. Operating cash flow remains robust at $3.81B for 2025, though net income dipped slightly to $2.59B.
Outlook is positive driven by LNG expansion and AI-powered energy demand, but risks include oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Chart Industries acquisition. Valuation metrics like a P/E of 18.42 and ROE of 17.14% suggest reasonable pricing for growth prospects, though execution on new contracts is critical for sustained upside.
TotalEnergies (TTE) trades at $81.21, up 3.45% today, with a neutral technical signal and bearish moving averages. The company reported Q1 2026 EPS of $2.45, beating expectations, but revenue has declined from $263.3B in 2022 to $182.3B in 2025. Valuation ratios are attractive with a P/E of 12.05 and EV/EBITDA of 4.93. Recent news highlights strategic moves in LNG and solar divestments to focus on larger renewable projects.
The outlook for TTE is supported by strong cash flow generation and a 'Buy' consensus from 57.6% of analysts, but risks include declining revenue trends, geopolitical exposure, and regulatory pressures. The stock offers value with solid profitability and shareholder returns via dividends, yet investors should weigh execution risks in its energy transition strategy.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →TotalEnergies is an integrated oil and gas company that explores for, produces, and refines oil around the world. In 2021, it produced 1.5 million barrels of liquids and 7.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. At year-end 2020, reserves stood at 12.1 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 45% of which are liquids. During 2021, it had LNG sales of 42 Mt. The company owns interests in refineries with capacity of nearly 1.8 million barrels a day, primarily in Europe, distributes refined products in 65 countries, and manufactures commodity and specialty chemicals. It also holds a 19% interest in Russian oil company Novatek. At year-end, its gross installed renewable power generation capacity was 10.3 GW.
Read more on TTE →