Compare Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Baker Hughes Co vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $57.9 (market cap $57.32B), while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF trades at $297.13. The key difference: Baker Hughes Co pays a 1.59% dividend while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF pays none, and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Baker Hughes Co nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $57.32B | — |
Sector | Energy | Broad Market / Factor |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $307.23 |
52-Week Low | $38.68 | $228.02 |
Enterprise Value | $58.72B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.59% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Baker Hughes (BKR) trades at $57.66, up 0.17% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. Recent earnings beats and a 66.7% buy rating from analysts, alongside a $74.09 price target, highlight positive momentum. The company secured key LNG and power infrastructure contracts, supporting growth in energy transition markets. Operating cash flow remains robust at $3.81B for 2025, though net income dipped slightly to $2.59B.
Outlook is positive driven by LNG expansion and AI-powered energy demand, but risks include oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Chart Industries acquisition. Valuation metrics like a P/E of 18.42 and ROE of 17.14% suggest reasonable pricing for growth prospects, though execution on new contracts is critical for sustained upside.
QQQM, tracking the Nasdaq-100, trades at $293.06, down 1.89% on the day amid a bearish technical signal from moving averages. The ETF's valuation ratios are unavailable, but it offers exposure to major tech firms, with recent news highlighting SpaceX's inclusion in the index. Support lies at $292, with resistance at $295.
The outlook is cautious due to stretched valuations and AI competition risks, but QQQM's lower expense ratio than QQQ provides a cost edge. Key risks include market volatility and sector concentration, while analyst sentiment is mixed, with some seeing long-term growth potential from AI infrastructure spending.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Baker Hughes Co
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →About Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
QQQM is an ETF designed to track the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It provides exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the NASDAQ. Positioned as a lower-cost and more long-term-investor-friendly alternative to its peer QQQ, QQQM offers the same fundamental market exposure but typically has a lower share price and is structured to appeal to investors focused on accumulation rather than active trading.
Read more on QQQM →
