Compare Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs Msci Inc (MSCI) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Baker Hughes Co vs Msci Inc — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $64.74 (market cap $64.34B), while Msci Inc trades at $562 (market cap $40.84B). The key difference: Baker Hughes Co is the larger of the two by market cap, and Msci Inc pays the higher dividend (1.46%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | MSCI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $64.34B | $40.84B |
Sector | Energy | Financials |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $643.83 |
52-Week Low | $42.51 | $511.84 |
Enterprise Value | $64.86B | $47.00B |
Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 1.46% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Baker Hughes Co
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →About Msci Inc
MSCI describes its mission as enabling investors to build better portfolios for a better world. MSCI's largest and most profitable segment is its index segment, where it provides benchmarking to asset managers and asset owners. In addition, it boasts over $1 trillion in ETF assets linked to MSCI indexes. The MSCI analytics segment provides portfolio management and risk management analytics software to asset managers and asset owners. MSCI's all other segment was broken out into ESG and climate and private assets segments in 2021. In ESG and climate, MSCI provides ESG data to the investment industry. In the private assets side, MSCI provides real restate reporting, market data, benchmarking, and analytics to investors and real estate managers.
Read more on MSCI →
