Baker Hughes Co vs Kinder Morgan Inc — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $64.97 (market cap $63.60B), while Kinder Morgan Inc trades at $31.6 (market cap $69.90B). The key difference: Baker Hughes Co and Kinder Morgan Inc are close in size by market cap, and Kinder Morgan Inc pays the higher dividend (3.76%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | KMI | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $63.60B | $69.90B |
Sector | Energy | Energy |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $34.31 |
52-Week Low | $42.51 | $25.84 |
Enterprise Value | $64.13B | $101.95B |
Dividend Yield | 1.44% | 3.76% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Baker Hughes (BKR) trades at $61.55, down 1.91% on the day, with strong technical momentum indicated by bullish moving averages. The company demonstrates solid fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS of $0.64 beating estimates and robust cash flow generation. Recent contract wins in subsea systems and LNG technology highlight growth opportunities in energy infrastructure.
The outlook remains positive with 66.7% analyst buy ratings and a $73.25 consensus target suggesting 19% upside. Key risks include oil producer spending volatility and integration challenges from the Chart acquisition. Strong institutional interest and consistent earnings beats support the bullish case for this energy technology leader.
Kinder Morgan (KMI) trades at $30.85, down 1.37% over the past day, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages and oscillators. The company reported strong Q2 2026 earnings, beating estimates with EPS of $0.37 versus $0.32 expected, and raised full-year guidance. Revenue for 2025 was $16.94 billion, with net income of $3.06 billion and a profit margin of 18.04%. Recent news highlights growth in natural gas infrastructure driven by LNG and power demand, supporting a dividend of $0.30 per share.
KMI presents a mixed outlook; fundamentals are solid with earnings beats and a robust project pipeline, but technical indicators signal near-term caution. Investment opportunities include dividend income and exposure to energy infrastructure growth, while risks involve debt levels and oil price volatility. Analyst consensus is nearly evenly split between buy and hold ratings, reflecting balanced sentiment amid macroeconomic uncertainties.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →Kinder Morgan is one of the largest midstream energy firms in North America, with an interest in or an operator on about 83,000 miles in pipelines and over 140 storage terminals. The company is active in the transportation, storage, and processing of natural gas, crude oil, refined products, natural gas liquids, and carbon dioxide. The majority of Kinder Morgan's cash flows stem from fee-based contracts for handling, moving, and storing fossil fuel products.
Read more on KMI →