Compare Baker Hughes Co (BKR) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Baker Hughes Co vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Baker Hughes Co trades at $56.08 (market cap $57.32B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.99. The key difference: Baker Hughes Co pays a 1.59% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BKR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $57.32B | — |
Sector | Energy | — |
52-Week High | $69.67 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $38.68 | $13.41 |
Enterprise Value | $58.72B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.59% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Baker Hughes (BKR) trades at $57.66, up 0.17% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus. Recent earnings beats and a 66.7% buy rating from analysts, alongside a $74.09 price target, highlight positive momentum. The company secured key LNG and power infrastructure contracts, supporting growth in energy transition markets. Operating cash flow remains robust at $3.81B for 2025, though net income dipped slightly to $2.59B.
Outlook is positive driven by LNG expansion and AI-powered energy demand, but risks include oil price volatility and integration challenges from the Chart Industries acquisition. Valuation metrics like a P/E of 18.42 and ROE of 17.14% suggest reasonable pricing for growth prospects, though execution on new contracts is critical for sustained upside.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.625, down 3.25% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bearish trend. The ETF holds 105 global renewable energy companies and has delivered strong year-to-date performance, driven by increased energy demand and policy support. Recent news highlights comparisons with traditional energy and uranium ETFs, emphasizing ICLN's growth focus versus income alternatives.
Outlook remains mixed: clean energy benefits from structural trends like AI-driven power demand and global decarbonization goals, but risks include regulatory uncertainty and high volatility. The ETF's valuation and growth potential appeal to long-term investors, though near-term price action suggests caution amid bearish technical signals.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Baker Hughes Co
Baker Hughes is a global leader in oilfield services and oilfield equipment, with particularly strong presences in the artificial lift, specialty chemicals, and completions markets. The other half of its business focuses on industrial power generation, process solutions, and industrial asset management, with high exposure to the liquid natural gas market specifically, as well as broader industrials end markets.
Read more on BKR →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
