BHP Billiton Limited vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? BHP Billiton Limited trades at $90.69 (market cap $229.15B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.47. The key difference: BHP Billiton Limited pays a 2.95% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and BHP Billiton Limited is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BHP | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $229.15B | — |
Sector | Basic Materials | — |
52-Week High | $93.15 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $52.14 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $243.35B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.95% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BHP trades at $90.61, up 0.22% with a bullish technical signal supported by moving averages. The company reported mixed Q4 2025 earnings, missing EPS estimates but maintaining strong profitability with 18.97% net margins. Recent operational challenges include strikes at Port Hedland iron ore operations, while copper production declines in Chile. Valuation metrics show a P/E of 22.36 and P/B of 4.54, reflecting premium pricing relative to historical levels.
The outlook remains cautiously optimistic with analyst consensus leaning hold (64.52%) amid labor disputes and production volatility. Key opportunities include exposure to AI-driven copper demand growth, while risks center on strike impacts and fluctuating commodity prices. The stock's current technical strength faces fundamental headwinds from operational disruptions.
ICLN trades at $18.69, up 3.37% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages showing 11 sell signals versus 2 buy signals. The ETF faces headwinds from higher expense ratios compared to traditional energy peers and regulatory uncertainty around renewable energy permits. Recent news highlights clean energy's 25% gains in 2026 but notes volatility concerns versus fossil fuel alternatives.
The outlook remains cautious as policy risks and competitive pressure from lower-cost energy ETFs challenge near-term performance. Long-term growth potential exists from global clean energy adoption, but investors face volatility and fee disadvantages relative to traditional energy funds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
BHP Group Limited operates as a mining company. The Company engages in the exploration, development, production, and processing of iron ore, metallurgical coal, and copper. BHP Group serves customers worldwide.
Read more on BHP →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →