KE Holdings Inc vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF — how do they compare? KE Holdings Inc trades at $17.25 (market cap $17.83B), while VanEck Gold Miners ETF trades at $74.48. The key difference: KE Holdings Inc pays a 1.71% dividend while VanEck Gold Miners ETF pays none, and KE Holdings Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, VanEck Gold Miners ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BEKE | GDX | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $17.83B | — |
Sector | Technology | — |
52-Week High | $20.36 | $115.84 |
52-Week Low | $14.26 | $51.15 |
Enterprise Value | $13.61B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.71% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BEKE trades at $16.07, up 3.21% today, with a bullish technical signal and strong analyst consensus (91.67% buy ratings). Recent Q1 2026 earnings beat expectations with EPS of $0.20 versus $0.14 forecast, driven by cost controls and operational efficiency. Revenue for 2025 was $94.58 billion, with a net income margin of 3.76%, though cash flow from operations was negative $376.17 million.
The outlook is positive given earnings momentum and oversold conditions suggesting a potential reversal. Risks include reliance on China's property market and volatile cash flows. With high institutional support and improving profitability, the stock presents a growth opportunity amid market recovery prospects.
No Aura AI signal available yet.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
KE Holdings (Beike) is China’s leading platform for housing transactions and services. It operates the Lianjia brand and uses data-driven technology to facilitate home sales, rentals, and home renovation services.
Read more on BEKE →The fund normally invests at least 80% of its total assets in common stocks and depositary receipts of companies involved in the gold mining industry. The index is a modified market-capitalization weighted index primarily comprised of publicly traded companies involved in the mining for gold and silver. The fund is non-diversified.
Read more on GDX →