Compare Becton Dickinson and Co (BDX) vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Becton Dickinson and Co vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Becton Dickinson and Co trades at $154.29 (market cap $41.51B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $19.2. The key difference: Becton Dickinson and Co pays a 2.79% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Becton Dickinson and Co nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| BDX | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $41.51B | — |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $185.39 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $135.49 | $13.41 |
Enterprise Value | $57.97B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.79% | — |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
BDX trades at $153.83, up 1.24% today, with technical indicators showing a neutral to bullish bias. The company has consistently beaten earnings estimates in recent quarters, with Q1 2026 EPS of $2.90 exceeding expectations. Revenue growth remains steady, reaching $21.84B in 2025, though net margins have compressed to 5.12%. Recent news highlights BDX's innovation in medical technology and positive analyst sentiment.
The outlook for BDX appears balanced. Upside potential exists from continued earnings beats and strategic positioning in growing healthcare segments like GLP-1 drug support equipment. However, risks include margin pressure, elevated debt levels, and cautious hospital spending. The consensus price target of $173.40 suggests moderate upside from current levels.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.625, down 3.25% on the day, with technical indicators showing a bearish trend. The ETF holds 105 global renewable energy companies and has delivered strong year-to-date performance, driven by increased energy demand and policy support. Recent news highlights comparisons with traditional energy and uranium ETFs, emphasizing ICLN's growth focus versus income alternatives.
Outlook remains mixed: clean energy benefits from structural trends like AI-driven power demand and global decarbonization goals, but risks include regulatory uncertainty and high volatility. The ETF's valuation and growth potential appeal to long-term investors, though near-term price action suggests caution amid bearish technical signals.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Becton Dickinson and Co
Becton, Dickinson is the world's largest manufacturer and distributor of medical surgical products, such as needles, syringes, and sharps-disposal units. The company also manufactures diagnostic instruments and reagents, as well as flow cytometry and cell-imaging systems. BD Interventional (largely the former Bard business) accounts for 23% of revenue. International revenue accounts for 44% of the company's business.
Read more on BDX →About iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →
