AstraZeneca plc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? AstraZeneca plc trades at $158.47 (market cap $248.14B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.43. The key difference: AstraZeneca plc pays a 2.01% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, AstraZeneca plc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AZN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $248.14B | — |
Sector | Health | — |
52-Week High | $209.48 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $147.06 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $275.41B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.01% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AstraZeneca (AZN) trades at $158.48, down 2.12% amid bearish technical signals and merger speculation. The stock shows strong fundamentals with revenue growth from $54.1B in 2024 to $58.7B in 2025 and net income reaching $10.2B. Recent earnings beats and a 47.5% analyst buy rating contrast with technical indicators showing oversold conditions near key support at $155.
Investment outlook remains positive based on earnings momentum and valuation metrics (P/E 23.76), though risks include potential merger integration challenges and ongoing legal investigations. The company's robust cash flow generation and dividend payments provide shareholder value support despite near-term volatility.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
A merger between Astra of Sweden and Zeneca Group of the United Kingdom formed AstraZeneca in 1999. The firm sells branded drugs across several major therapeutic classes, including gastrointestinal, diabetes, cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer, and immunology. The majority of sales come from international markets with the United States representing close to one third of its sales.
Read more on AZN →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →