American States Water Company vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? American States Water Company trades at $87.85 (market cap $3.47B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.5. The key difference: American States Water Company pays a 2.49% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and American States Water Company is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AWR | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $3.47B | — |
Sector | Utilities | — |
52-Week High | $89.28 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $70.10 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $4.37B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.49% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AWR trades at $87.95, up 1.59% on the day, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages. The company reported a Q2 2026 EPS beat of $1.09 versus $0.915 expected, driven by water rate increases and revenue growth. Recent news highlights its 71-year dividend growth streak and an 8.2% dividend hike announced in July 2026. Financials show solid profitability with a 20.52% net income margin and ROE of 13.62%, though valuation ratios like P/E of 23.92 are above sector averages.
Outlook is mixed: strong dividend history and earnings growth support income investors, but elevated valuation and mixed analyst consensus (20% buy, 50% hold, 30% sell) suggest limited near-term upside. Key risks include regulatory dependence on rate approvals and potential overvaluation relative to peers.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
American States Water provides water and electric services to over one million people in the U.S. It also manages water and wastewater systems for various military bases under long-term privatization contracts.
Read more on AWR →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →