Aspen Aerogels Inc vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? Aspen Aerogels Inc trades at $6.15 (market cap $509.55M), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $5.29 (market cap $2.26B). The key difference: Under Armour Inc Class A is far larger — about 4.4× Aspen Aerogels Inc's market cap, and Aspen Aerogels Inc is trading nearer its 52-week high, Under Armour Inc Class A nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ASPN | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $509.55M | $2.26B |
Sector | Technology | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $8.82 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $2.57 | $4.17 |
Enterprise Value | $482.96M | $3.24B |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aspen Aerogels (ASPN) trades at $6.13, down 2.54% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages despite mixed oscillators. The company shows improving revenue trends with Q2 2026 results beating expectations and strong Q3 guidance of $65-80 million revenue. However, profitability remains challenged with negative net income margins of -62.45% and consecutive quarterly EPS misses. Analyst sentiment is overwhelmingly positive with 82.61% buy ratings.
The outlook balances strong revenue growth potential in thermal barrier markets against persistent profitability challenges. Investment opportunity lies in the expanding EV thermal barrier business and European market growth, while risks include sustained negative cash flow and competitive pressures in evolving battery technologies.
Under Armour (UAA) is trading at $5.265, down 10.15% with bearish technical signals despite recent earnings beats. The company faces significant fundamental challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends from $5.7B in 2024 to $5.2B in 2025. Recent Q1 2027 earnings showed a profit beat but weaker revenue and cautious guidance, reflecting ongoing struggles in North American and Asia-Pacific markets. Cash flow remains negative at -$362M for 2025, though valuation ratios like P/S of 0.46 appear attractive relative to peers.
The outlook remains challenging with persistent revenue declines and profitability issues offset by potential value opportunities. Key risks include weak consumer spending, inventory management challenges, and competitive pressures. Analyst consensus is mixed with 27% buy ratings but a $6.67 price target suggesting 27% upside from current levels, though institutional sentiment appears cautious given the technical bearish signals and fundamental headwinds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Aspen Aerogels is an aerogel technology company that designs high-performance insulation. Its products are used in energy infrastructure and electric vehicles to provide thermal management and fire protection.
Read more on ASPN →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →