Compare Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance
Price movement over the last 24 hours
Key statistics
Key statistics
Aptiv PLC vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Aptiv PLC trades at $60.08 (market cap $12.82B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $98.39 (market cap $95.25B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 7.4× Aptiv PLC's market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, Aptiv PLC nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| APTV | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $12.82B | $95.25B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $76.82 | $97.64 |
52-Week Low | $52.57 | $58.65 |
Enterprise Value | $19.53B | $93.54B |
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Aura AI Summary
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
APTV trades at $60.57, up 1.19% with a bearish technical signal but strong analyst support. Recent earnings beats and a consensus price target of $78.57 suggest upside potential. Revenue grew to $20.40B in 2025, though net margins compressed to 1.77%. The company announced Q2 2026 results on August 4, 2026, with expectations of $1.42 EPS.
Outlook is mixed: bullish fundamentals from earnings momentum and low P/S of 0.64 contrast with technical weakness and margin pressures. Risks include debt levels and competitive threats, but institutional buy ratings (63.6%) highlight confidence in long-term growth from automotive technology demand.
Monster Beverage (MNST) trades at $97.39, up 0.87% today, showing strong momentum after recent earnings beats. The stock exhibits a bullish technical trend, with moving averages supporting further upside, while oscillators are neutral. Fundamentally, the company reported robust revenue growth to $8.29 billion in 2025, with a net income margin of 23.11%, and announced a 2-for-1 stock split effective August 2026, reflecting confidence in future performance.
The outlook remains positive given consistent earnings outperformance and international expansion, but high valuation multiples like a P/E of 47.05 pose risks if growth slows. Investor sentiment is buoyed by analyst consensus favoring buys, though competitive pressures and macroeconomic factors warrant caution for sustained gains.
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Aptiv PLC
Aptiv's signal and power solutions segment supplies components and systems that make up a vehicle's electrical system backbone, including wiring assemblies and harnesses, connectors, electrical centers, and hybrid electrical systems. The advanced safety and user experience segment provides body controls, infotainment and connectivity systems, passive and active safety electronics, advanced driver-assist technologies, and displays, as well as the development of software for these systems. Aptiv's largest customer is General Motors at roughly 12% of 2021 revenue, including sales to GM's Shanghai joint venture, followed by Stellantis at 11%, and Volkswagen at 9%. North America and Europe represented approximately 38% and 33% of total 2019 revenue, respectively.
Read more on APTV →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
