Compare Aptiv PLC (APTV) vs Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Aptiv PLC vs Monster Beverage Corp — how do they compare? Aptiv PLC trades at $50 (market cap $10.30B), while Monster Beverage Corp trades at $45.58 (market cap $89.20B). The key difference: Monster Beverage Corp is far larger — about 8.7× Aptiv PLC's market cap, and Monster Beverage Corp is trading nearer its 52-week high, Aptiv PLC nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| APTV | MNST | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $10.30B | $89.20B |
Sector | Consumer Cyclical | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $76.82 | $49.97 |
52-Week Low | $46.30 | $30.86 |
Enterprise Value | $15.23B | $87.49B |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
Top news
Latest headlines on both assets
About Aptiv PLC
Aptiv's signal and power solutions segment supplies components and systems that make up a vehicle's electrical system backbone, including wiring assemblies and harnesses, connectors, electrical centers, and hybrid electrical systems. The advanced safety and user experience segment provides body controls, infotainment and connectivity systems, passive and active safety electronics, advanced driver-assist technologies, and displays, as well as the development of software for these systems. Aptiv's largest customer is General Motors at roughly 12% of 2021 revenue, including sales to GM's Shanghai joint venture, followed by Stellantis at 11%, and Volkswagen at 9%. North America and Europe represented approximately 38% and 33% of total 2019 revenue, respectively.
Read more on APTV →About Monster Beverage Corp
Monster Beverage is a leader in the energy drink subsegment of the beverage industry. The Monster trademark anchors the portfolio, and notable offerings include Monster Energy and Monster Ultra. The firm has also started to incubate new trademarks for emerging enclaves of the energy space, like Reign in performance energy. It is primarily a brand owner, outsourcing most of its manufacturing processes to third-party copackers. It primarily uses the Coca-Cola bottling system for distribution after a strategic agreement in which Coke became Monster's largest shareholder (nearly 20%) and that also included the exchange of certain businesses between the two firms. Most of Monster's revenue is generated in the United States, though international geographies are increasing in the mix.
Read more on MNST →
