American Superconductor Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? American Superconductor Corporation trades at $32.48 (market cap $1.56B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.42. The key difference: iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, American Superconductor Corporation nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AMSC | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $1.56B | — |
Sector | Technology | — |
52-Week High | $66.68 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $25.95 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $1.42B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AMSC trades at $32.28, up 4.16% today, but faces a bearish technical outlook with 14 sell signals versus 3 buys. The company reported strong revenue growth with Q1 2026 sales up 30% to $94.1M (Zacks, Aug 7, 2026) and a record backlog over $400M, though Q2 earnings missed estimates amid margin pressure. Net income margin improved dramatically to 42.56% in 2026 from 2.7% in 2025, but cash flow turned negative with a $60M net outflow in 2026.
The stock presents a mixed opportunity: robust order growth and expanding margins support upside, but high EV/EBITDA (65.73) and technical weakness pose risks. Analyst consensus is bullish (53% Buy), yet investors should watch execution on backlog conversion and margin sustainability amid competitive and cost pressures.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
AMSC provides energy technology solutions for smarter and cleaner power grids. It offers wind turbine electronic controls and advanced grid systems that enhance the reliability and efficiency of renewable energy networks.
Read more on AMSC →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →