Amgen, Inc. vs ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF — how do they compare? Amgen, Inc. trades at $415.21 (market cap $224.14B), while ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF trades at $92.44. The key difference: Amgen, Inc. pays a 2.43% dividend while ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF pays none, and Amgen, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AMGN | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $224.14B | — |
Sector | Health | Leveraged / Inverse |
52-Week High | $417.20 | $100.53 |
52-Week Low | $271.18 | $57.16 |
Enterprise Value | $267.45B | — |
Dividend Yield | 2.43% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Amgen (AMGN) trades at $417.20, up 1.52% with strong technical momentum as price approaches resistance near $421. The company demonstrates robust fundamentals with Q2 2026 EPS beating estimates at $6.29 versus $5.62 expected, marking the third consecutive quarterly beat. Revenue growth continues with 2025 revenue reaching $36.75 billion and 2026 projected at $38.1 billion, supported by strong performance from key products like Tezspire and Repatha.
Amgen presents a compelling growth story with raised 2026 guidance and strong product pipeline, though elevated valuation ratios (P/E 25.73, P/S 5.91) and high debt levels ($56.55 billion long-term debt) warrant caution. Analyst consensus remains bullish with 59% buy ratings and $394.69 price target, but current price trades above consensus target, suggesting near-term consolidation potential.
QLD, the ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF, trades at $92.56, up 1.01% today, with a bullish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. The ETF, offering 2x daily leverage on the Nasdaq-100, has delivered over 10,000% total return since inception, though it carries amplified risk. Recent institutional buying includes 180 Wealth Advisors increasing its position by 29.4% in Q2 2026, signaling confidence in tech exposure.
The outlook for QLD hinges on tech sector performance, with AI optimism and easing geopolitical tensions as tailwinds. However, leveraged ETF structure risks decay in volatile markets, and a 63.80% historical drawdown underscores volatility. Investors seeking aggressive tech growth may find opportunity, but must tolerate significant swings; diversification and risk management are critical.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Amgen is a leader in biotechnology-based human therapeutics, with historical expertise in renal disease and cancer supportive-care products. Flagship drugs include red blood cell boosters Epogen and Aranesp, immune system boosters Neupogen and Neulasta, and Enbrel and Otezla for inflammatory diseases. Amgen introduced its first cancer therapeutic, Vectibix, in 2006 and markets bone-strengthening drug Prolia/Xgeva (approved 2010) and Evenity (2019). The acquisition of Onyx bolstered the firm's therapeutic oncology portfolio with Kyprolis. Recent launches include Repatha (cholesterol-lowering), Aimovig (migraine), Lumakras (lung cancer), and Tezspire (asthma). Amgen's biosimilar portfolio includes Mvasi (biosimilar Avastin), Kanjinti (biosimilar Herceptin), and Amgevita (biosimilar Humira).
Read more on AMGN →QLD is a leveraged ETF that seeks daily investment results corresponding to 200% of the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It achieves 2x leverage by investing in financial instruments such as swaps and is designed as a tactical trading tool for investors with a bullish (long) view on the NASDAQ-100. Due to the effects of compounding and leverage, the ETF is intended to be held for a single day and is not suitable for long-term investment.
Read more on QLD →