Akamai Technologies, Inc. vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Akamai Technologies, Inc. trades at $123.25 (market cap $16.77B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.42. The key difference: Akamai Technologies, Inc. is trading nearer its 52-week high, iShares Global Clean Energy ETF nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AKAM | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $16.77B | — |
Sector | Technology | — |
52-Week High | $161.14 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $71.97 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $22.75B | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Akamai Technologies (AKAM) trades at $122.67, up 4.27% with strong earnings momentum after beating Q2 2026 estimates. The stock shows bearish technical signals but maintains solid fundamentals with $4.21B revenue and 57.45% gross margins. Recent analyst upgrades and a $600M cloud contract highlight growth potential in AI and cybersecurity services.
Outlook remains cautiously optimistic with a $150.11 consensus price target offering 22% upside, though margin compression and competitive pressures present risks. Institutional sentiment leans neutral with 49% hold ratings, requiring monitoring of Q3 earnings execution and infrastructure investment returns.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Akamai operates a content delivery network, or CDN, which entails locating servers at the edges of networks so its customers, which store content on Akamai servers, can reach their own customers faster, more securely, and with better quality. Akamai has over 325,000 servers distributed over 4,000 points of presence in more than 1,000 cities worldwide. Its customers generally include media companies, which stream video content or make video games available for download, and other enterprises that run interactive or high-traffic websites, such as e-commerce firms and financial institutions. Akamai also has a significant security business, which is integrated with its core web and media businesses to protect its customers from cyberthreats.
Read more on AKAM →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →