AGCO Corporation vs Yum! Brands, Inc. — how do they compare? AGCO Corporation trades at $101.37 (market cap $7.10B), while Yum! Brands, Inc. trades at $144.74 (market cap $39.50B). The key difference: Yum! Brands, Inc. is far larger — about 5.6× AGCO Corporation's market cap, and Yum! Brands, Inc. pays the higher dividend (2.07%). Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AGCO | YUM | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.10B | $39.50B |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $140.49 | $168.16 |
52-Week Low | $100.14 | $138.21 |
Enterprise Value | $9.37B | $51.10B |
Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 2.07% |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AGCO trades at $101.55, up 0.67% on the day, with a bearish technical signal and mixed fundamentals. Recent Q2 2026 earnings missed estimates, leading to an 11% share drop and multiple legal investigations. The company maintains a solid balance sheet with $612M cash and a 5.15% net income margin, but faces headwinds from lowered 2026 guidance and weak agricultural demand.
The outlook is cautious; while valuation ratios like P/E of 14.03 appear attractive and analysts set a $124.63 consensus target, risks from earnings volatility, legal scrutiny, and industry softness outweigh near-term opportunities. Investors should weigh the dividend yield against potential further downside from ongoing investigations and macroeconomic pressures.
YUM trades at $150.15, up 3.32% in the past 24 hours, with a bearish technical signal from moving averages but neutral oscillators. Recent earnings show a Q2 2026 beat with EPS of $1.62 versus $1.57 expected, while revenue grew to $8.21B in 2025. The company completed the sale of Pizza Hut China for $1.2B in August 2026, aiming to streamline operations and reduce debt. Cash flow from operations improved to $2.01B in 2025, supporting a dividend payment of $0.75 per share.
The outlook is mixed, with analyst consensus leaning hold (56.87%) but a price target of $174.60 implying 16% upside. Risks include ongoing legal investigations and a parasite outbreak impacting Taco Bell sales, though management reports recovery. Debt remains high at $11.25B long-term, but the debt-to-asset ratio improved to 143.49 in 2025. Execution on digital growth and brand focus post-Pizza Hut sale are key to unlocking value.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Agco is a global manufacturer of agricultural equipment. The company has five principal brands: Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Challenger, Valtra, and GSI. Unlike its competitors, Agco's product line extends beyond self-propelled equipment and implements by offering grain handling systems and livestock management solutions. Its products are available through a global dealer network, which includes over 3,200 dealer and distribution locations. Additionally, Agco offers both retail and wholesale financing to customers through its joint venture with Rabobank, a European food and agriculture focused bank.
Read more on AGCO →Yum Brands is a U.S.-based restaurant operator featuring a portfolio of four brands: KFC (26,930 global units), Pizza Hut (18,380 units), Taco Bell (7,790 units), and The Habit Burger (310 units) at year-end 2021. With $58 billion in 2021 systemwide sales, the firm is the second-largest restaurant company in the world, behind McDonald's ($112.5 billion) but ahead of Restaurant Brands International ($36 billion) and Starbucks ($25 billion). Yum is 98% franchised, with the largest franchisee, Yum China, created via a 2016 spinoff transaction (after which Yum China agreed to pay 3% royalties to Yum Brands in perpetuity). Yum is the newest evolution of Tricon Brands, formerly a division of PepsiCo, and generates the bulk of its revenue from franchise royalties and marketing contributions.
Read more on YUM →