AGCO Corporation vs TeraWulf Inc — how do they compare? AGCO Corporation trades at $101.31 (market cap $7.10B), while TeraWulf Inc trades at $17.36 (market cap $8.35B). The key difference: TeraWulf Inc is the larger of the two by market cap, and AGCO Corporation pays a 1.18% dividend while TeraWulf Inc pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AGCO | WULF | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.10B | $8.35B |
Sector | Industrials | Technology |
52-Week High | $140.49 | $28.98 |
52-Week Low | $100.14 | $5.24 |
Enterprise Value | $9.37B | $10.97B |
Dividend Yield | 1.18% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AGCO trades at $101.58, up 0.7% today, but remains under pressure after a Q2 2026 earnings miss and lowered full-year guidance triggered an 11% sell-off in late July 2026. The stock shows bearish technical signals with support near $99 and resistance at $102. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue was $10.08B with a net income margin of 7.2%, but 2026 projections indicate softer profitability. Recent leadership changes and ongoing securities investigations add uncertainty, though the consensus price target of $124.63 suggests potential upside from current levels.
The outlook is cautious due to weaker agricultural demand and earnings volatility. Investment appeal hinges on execution of the PTx growth strategy and margin recovery, but risks include legal probes and cyclical industry headwinds. Analyst sentiment is mixed with 38% buy ratings, reflecting divided views on near-term recovery prospects.
WULF trades at $17.04, up 5.19% on the day amid a broader neocloud infrastructure rally. The stock shows bearish technical signals with 17 sell signals versus 2 buys, while fundamentals reveal significant challenges with a -1,179.94% net income margin and consistent earnings misses. Recent Q2 2026 results showed a $0.37 per share loss versus $0.20 expected, though revenue beat estimates. The company is expanding its high-performance computing capacity with 102 MW operational and 336 MW under construction, supported by a major Anthropic leasing agreement.
Despite unanimous analyst buy ratings and a $38 consensus price target representing 123% upside, WULF faces substantial execution risks and profitability concerns. The transition to AI infrastructure offers long-term potential, but near-term losses and high capital requirements create volatility. Investors should weigh the significant growth opportunity against persistent negative cash flow and competitive pressures in the evolving data center market.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Agco is a global manufacturer of agricultural equipment. The company has five principal brands: Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Challenger, Valtra, and GSI. Unlike its competitors, Agco's product line extends beyond self-propelled equipment and implements by offering grain handling systems and livestock management solutions. Its products are available through a global dealer network, which includes over 3,200 dealer and distribution locations. Additionally, Agco offers both retail and wholesale financing to customers through its joint venture with Rabobank, a European food and agriculture focused bank.
Read more on AGCO →TeraWulf develops, owns, and operates fully integrated digital infrastructure powered by predominantly zero-carbon energy. It utilizes a hybrid business model that combines industrial-scale Bitcoin mining with high-performance computing (HPC) and AI hosting, leveraging sustainable power sources like nuclear and hydroelectric to deliver low-cost, energy-efficient data center solutions.
Read more on WULF →