AGCO Corporation vs Under Armour Inc Class A — how do they compare? AGCO Corporation trades at $101.26 (market cap $7.10B), while Under Armour Inc Class A trades at $5.25 (market cap $2.26B). The key difference: AGCO Corporation is far larger — about 3.1× Under Armour Inc Class A's market cap, and AGCO Corporation pays a 1.18% dividend while Under Armour Inc Class A pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AGCO | UAA | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.10B | $2.26B |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $140.49 | $8.14 |
52-Week Low | $100.14 | $4.17 |
Enterprise Value | $9.37B | $3.24B |
Dividend Yield | 1.18% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AGCO trades at $101.58, up 0.7% today, but remains under pressure after a Q2 2026 earnings miss and lowered full-year guidance triggered an 11% sell-off in late July 2026. The stock shows bearish technical signals with support near $99 and resistance at $102. Fundamentally, 2025 revenue was $10.08B with a net income margin of 7.2%, but 2026 projections indicate softer profitability. Recent leadership changes and ongoing securities investigations add uncertainty, though the consensus price target of $124.63 suggests potential upside from current levels.
The outlook is cautious due to weaker agricultural demand and earnings volatility. Investment appeal hinges on execution of the PTx growth strategy and margin recovery, but risks include legal probes and cyclical industry headwinds. Analyst sentiment is mixed with 38% buy ratings, reflecting divided views on near-term recovery prospects.
Under Armour (UAA) is trading at $5.265, down 10.15% with bearish technical signals despite recent earnings beats. The company faces significant fundamental challenges with negative net income margins (-9.99%) and declining revenue trends from $5.7B in 2024 to $5.2B in 2025. Recent Q1 2027 earnings showed a profit beat but weaker revenue and cautious guidance, reflecting ongoing struggles in North American and Asia-Pacific markets. Cash flow remains negative at -$362M for 2025, though valuation ratios like P/S of 0.46 appear attractive relative to peers.
The outlook remains challenging with persistent revenue declines and profitability issues offset by potential value opportunities. Key risks include weak consumer spending, inventory management challenges, and competitive pressures. Analyst consensus is mixed with 27% buy ratings but a $6.67 price target suggesting 27% upside from current levels, though institutional sentiment appears cautious given the technical bearish signals and fundamental headwinds.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Agco is a global manufacturer of agricultural equipment. The company has five principal brands: Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Challenger, Valtra, and GSI. Unlike its competitors, Agco's product line extends beyond self-propelled equipment and implements by offering grain handling systems and livestock management solutions. Its products are available through a global dealer network, which includes over 3,200 dealer and distribution locations. Additionally, Agco offers both retail and wholesale financing to customers through its joint venture with Rabobank, a European food and agriculture focused bank.
Read more on AGCO →Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America and other territories. Consumers of its apparel include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through direct-to-consumer, including e-commerce and more than 400 combined factory house and brand house stores, and wholesale channels. Under Armour also operates a digital fitness app called MapMyFitness. The Baltimore-based company was founded in 1996.
Read more on UAA →