AGCO Corporation vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? AGCO Corporation trades at $101.37 (market cap $7.10B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.5. The key difference: AGCO Corporation pays a 1.18% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, AGCO Corporation nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AGCO | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $7.10B | — |
Sector | Industrials | — |
52-Week High | $140.49 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $100.14 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $9.37B | — |
Dividend Yield | 1.18% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
AGCO trades at $101.55, up 0.67% on the day, with a bearish technical signal and mixed fundamentals. Recent Q2 2026 earnings missed estimates, leading to an 11% share drop and multiple legal investigations. The company maintains a solid balance sheet with $612M cash and a 5.15% net income margin, but faces headwinds from lowered 2026 guidance and weak agricultural demand.
The outlook is cautious; while valuation ratios like P/E of 14.03 appear attractive and analysts set a $124.63 consensus target, risks from earnings volatility, legal scrutiny, and industry softness outweigh near-term opportunities. Investors should weigh the dividend yield against potential further downside from ongoing investigations and macroeconomic pressures.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Agco is a global manufacturer of agricultural equipment. The company has five principal brands: Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Challenger, Valtra, and GSI. Unlike its competitors, Agco's product line extends beyond self-propelled equipment and implements by offering grain handling systems and livestock management solutions. Its products are available through a global dealer network, which includes over 3,200 dealer and distribution locations. Additionally, Agco offers both retail and wholesale financing to customers through its joint venture with Rabobank, a European food and agriculture focused bank.
Read more on AGCO →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →