Aecom vs National Beverage Corp. — how do they compare? Aecom trades at $61.65 (market cap $8.62B), while National Beverage Corp. trades at $30.77 (market cap $2.89B). The key difference: Aecom is far larger — about 3× National Beverage Corp.'s market cap, and Aecom pays a 1.77% dividend while National Beverage Corp. pays none. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ACM | FIZZ | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $8.62B | $2.89B |
Sector | Industrials | Consumer Cyclical |
52-Week High | $134.35 | $46.75 |
52-Week Low | $66.86 | $30.53 |
Enterprise Value | $10.81B | $2.60B |
Dividend Yield | 1.77% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
ACM's stock declined 15.32% to $62.07, driven by a Q2 2026 earnings miss with a loss of $0.50 per share versus a $1.46 estimate, alongside a securities fraud investigation announcement (Business Wire, August 11, 2026). Technical indicators are bearish, with support at $62. Despite this, revenue reached $16.14 billion in 2025, and analyst consensus remains positive with a $88.25 price target and 64% buy ratings.
The outlook is mixed: strong fundamentals like a low P/S of 0.57 and record backlog offer upside, but near-term risks from project delays and legal scrutiny may pressure the stock. Earnings volatility and negative ROE/ROA highlight execution challenges, requiring careful monitoring of quarterly results and legal developments for investor confidence.
FIZZ trades at $30.60, down 1.42% on the day, with bearish technical signals dominating. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong profitability metrics including 37% gross margins and 34% ROE, but faces growth challenges as revenue has stagnated around $1.2B annually. Recent earnings have missed expectations in three of the last four quarters, while the company maintains dividend payments with a recent $3.25 special dividend declaration.
The outlook remains cautious given stalled revenue growth and bearish analyst sentiment with 50% sell ratings. While valuation appears reasonable at 15.7x P/E, competitive pressures in the sparkling water market and declining LaCroix volumes present significant headwinds. The stock's current technical weakness near support levels suggests continued pressure unless fundamental catalysts emerge.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Latest headlines on both assets
Aecom is one of the largest global providers of design, engineering, construction, and management services. The firm serves a broad spectrum of end markets including infrastructure, water, transportation, and energy. Based in Los Angeles, Aecom has a presence in over 150 countries and employs 51,000. The company generated $13.3 billion in sales and $701 million in adjusted operating income in fiscal 2021.
Read more on ACM →National Beverage Corp is one of the top 10 non-alcoholic beverage companies in the U.S. Its portfolio skews toward functional drinks (that is those purporting to offer health benefits) and is anchored by the popular LaCroix sparkling water trademark. Other offerings include Rip It energy drinks, Everfresh juices, and soda brands like Shasta and Faygo. The firm controls most of its production and distribution apparatus, with very little outsourcing. In terms of go-to-market, it uses warehouse distribution for big-box retailers, direct-store-delivery for convenience stores and other small outlets, and food-service distributors for the food-service channel (schools, hospitals, restaurants). It is controlled by chairman and CEO Nick Caporella, who owns over 73% of the common stock.
Read more on FIZZ →