Albertsons Companies Inc vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF — how do they compare? Albertsons Companies Inc trades at $12.05 (market cap $5.95B), while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF trades at $18.42. The key difference: Albertsons Companies Inc pays a 5.55% dividend while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF pays none, and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Albertsons Companies Inc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| ACI | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $5.95B | — |
Sector | Consumer Staples | — |
52-Week High | $19.74 | $23.75 |
52-Week Low | $11.03 | $13.66 |
Enterprise Value | $21.35B | — |
Dividend Yield | 5.55% | — |
Signals from Pluang's Aura AI — not financial advice
Albertsons (ACI) trades at $11.98, down 1.24% with bearish technical signals despite recent insider buying by the CEO and CFO. The stock shows mixed fundamentals with strong revenue growth to $80.39B in 2025 but declining net margins to 0.08%. Recent Q2 2026 earnings missed expectations, triggering a 22% selloff and multiple legal investigations. Analyst consensus remains cautious with a $13.20 price target and 56.52% hold rating.
ACI presents a high-risk opportunity trading near multi-year lows with potential upside to analyst targets. Key catalysts include ACI Edge restructuring and digital initiatives, but investors face significant execution risks amid margin pressure and competitive grocery markets. The stock's deep value case is complicated by earnings volatility and ongoing legal scrutiny.
ICLN, the iShares Global Clean Energy ETF, trades at $18.41, up 1.83% today, but technical indicators signal a bearish trend with moving averages and overall momentum pointing lower. The fund provides exposure to 105 global renewable energy companies, though key valuation and profitability ratios are not publicly disclosed for the ETF itself. Recent news highlights strong 2026 performance with over 25% gains, driven by global energy security concerns and data center power demand, though it faces competition from traditional energy ETFs offering lower fees and higher yields.
The outlook for ICLN is mixed; clean energy tailwinds from policy support and electrification trends offer growth potential, but risks include regulatory hurdles, fee competitiveness, and volatility. Analyst sentiment is cautious due to fee comparisons and policy dependence, with institutional interest balanced against outperformance of alternatives like uranium ETFs. Investment suitability hinges on appetite for clean energy sector volatility versus stable income.
Trailing returns across standard periods
Albertsons is the second-largest traditional grocer in America, operating 2,276 stores under 24 banners in 34 states (as of the end of fiscal 2021). Around 75% of stores have pharmacies, while nearly 20% also sell fuel. Albertsons has a significant private-label operation, accounting for around 20% of sales (excluding fuel). While its own brand assortment is mainly manufactured by third parties, Albertsons operates 20 food production plants (as of the end of fiscal 2021). Albertsons is a top-two grocer in two thirds of its major markets (as of early 2022, according to company data), and virtually all of its sales come from the United States.
Read more on ACI →The index is designed to track the performance of approximately 100 clean energy-related companies. The fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the target index. The index may invest up to 20% of its assets in certain futures, trading options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents, as well as in securities not included in the index. It is non-diversified.
Read more on ICLN →