Compare Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) vs Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) Price & Performance
Price performance (Past 24H)
Key statistics
Key statistics
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs Smith & Nephew plc — how do they compare? Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF trades at $43.68, while Smith & Nephew plc trades at $29.95 (market cap $12.54B). The key difference: Smith & Nephew plc pays a 2.65% dividend while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays none, and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Smith & Nephew plc nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AAAU | SNN | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture | Health |
52-Week High | $53.21 | $38.70 |
52-Week Low | $32.74 | $28.73 |
Market Cap | — | $12.54B |
Enterprise Value | — | $15.57B |
Dividend Yield | — | 2.65% |
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
Returns comparison
Trailing returns across standard periods
About Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
AAAU tracks the price of gold bullion by holding physical gold bars in secure vaults. Managed by Goldman Sachs, this ETF offers a cost-effective way to gain direct exposure to gold without the logistical challenges of storage or insurance.
Read more on AAAU →About Smith & Nephew plc
Smith & Nephew designs, manufactures, and markets orthopedic devices, sports medicine and arthroscopic technologies, and wound-care solutions. Roughly 42% of the U.K.-based firm's revenue comes from orthopedic products, and another 30% is sports medicine and ENT. The remaining 28% of revenue is from the advanced wound therapy segment. Roughly half of Smith & Nephew's total revenue comes from the United States, just over 30% is from other developed markets, and emerging markets account for the remainder.
Read more on SNN →
