Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF vs Kimberly Clark Corp — how do they compare? Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF trades at $43.5, while Kimberly Clark Corp trades at $107.99 (market cap $36.11B). The key difference: Kimberly Clark Corp pays a 4.72% dividend while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF pays none, and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF is trading nearer its 52-week high, Kimberly Clark Corp nearer its low. Which is the better fit depends on your goals.
| AAAU | KMB | |
|---|---|---|
Sector | Commodities - Metals/Agriculture | Consumer Staples |
52-Week High | $53.21 | $134.81 |
52-Week Low | $32.74 | $93.05 |
Market Cap | — | $36.11B |
Enterprise Value | — | $41.67B |
Dividend Yield | — | 4.72% |
Trailing returns across standard periods
AAAU tracks the price of gold bullion by holding physical gold bars in secure vaults. Managed by Goldman Sachs, this ETF offers a cost-effective way to gain direct exposure to gold without the logistical challenges of storage or insurance.
Read more on AAAU →With around half of sales from personal care and another third from tissue products, Kimberly-Clark sits as a leading manufacturer of tissue and hygiene realm. Its brand mix includes Huggies, Pull-Ups, Kotex, Depend, Kleenex, and Cottonelle. The firm also operates K-C Professional, which partners with businesses to provide safety and sanitary products for the workplace. Kimberly-Clark generates just over of half its sales in North America and more than 10% in Europe, with the rest primarily concentrated in Asia and Latin America.
Read more on KMB →